2014
DOI: 10.9707/1944-5660.1200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Instruments Used to Evaluate Foundation-Funded Nonprofit Capacity- Building Programs: Considerations for Organized Philanthropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While more testing is needed, the revised assessment is useful for rural nonprofits to quickly evaluate areas of strength and challenge. With funders placing greater concern on organizational capacity, rural nonprofits may be at a disadvantage for funding opportunities, and therefore, these organizations must carefully attend to perceived deficiencies to become more competitive while remaining true to their values and community context (Brown 2014;Karsh and Fox 2014;Minzner et al 2014;Walters 2020). Conversely, nonprofit influencers (e.g., funders, capacity builders, policymakers) need to be less rigid and more thoughtful about how conventional standards-often made specifically for and by nonprofits in urban settings-may or may not fit nonprofits in rural settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While more testing is needed, the revised assessment is useful for rural nonprofits to quickly evaluate areas of strength and challenge. With funders placing greater concern on organizational capacity, rural nonprofits may be at a disadvantage for funding opportunities, and therefore, these organizations must carefully attend to perceived deficiencies to become more competitive while remaining true to their values and community context (Brown 2014;Karsh and Fox 2014;Minzner et al 2014;Walters 2020). Conversely, nonprofit influencers (e.g., funders, capacity builders, policymakers) need to be less rigid and more thoughtful about how conventional standards-often made specifically for and by nonprofits in urban settings-may or may not fit nonprofits in rural settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, a stronger focus has emerged on organizational capacity with funders of nonprofits (e.g., foundations, governments), with significant concerns regarding an organization's ability to effectively manage and utilize money (Brown 2014;Karsh and Fox 2014;Minzner et al 2014). This expectation, along with a "do more with less" fiscal environment (Luma Consulting 2016), has manifested in hesitations and failures in investing in small or grassroots organizations and increased competition for funding across the nonprofit sector (Karsh and Fox 2014).…”
Section: Nonprofits and Organizational Capacity-framework And Measure...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, EFA is used to test the concepts and to identify the critical PM resources of NGOs (Lewis-Beck, 1994). CFA is applied to evaluate the overall measurement model based on a priori theory or the results of EFA and it is also widely used to study the associations between a set of observed variables and their underlying latent constructs (Bryne, 2013;Brown, 2014). The CFA technique is applied in previous RBV research to confirm the measurement model of organisational resources (Wahjudono et al, 2013;Jafari and Rezaee, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFA is generally applied to understand the associations between observed variables and underlying latent constructs (Brown 2014;Bryne 1994). As CFA is used to examine that the measures of constructs are consistent with the literature, it is applied in this study to evaluate the overall measurement model based on the latent constructs of project success.…”
Section: Justification and Selection Of Cfa And Semmentioning
confidence: 99%