1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1824(199901/03)2:1<1::aid-we16>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of modelling methods for wind turbine wakes and wind farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
229
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
229
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The PARK model developed by Jensen (1983) and the eddy viscosity model developed by Ainslie (1988) are commonly used, and a comprehensive review of wake modeling can be found in Crespo et al (1999). Such approaches decouple the wind flow calculation from the wake calculation and use wake models calibrated to a single turbine in isolation.…”
Section: Wind Plant Flow Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PARK model developed by Jensen (1983) and the eddy viscosity model developed by Ainslie (1988) are commonly used, and a comprehensive review of wake modeling can be found in Crespo et al (1999). Such approaches decouple the wind flow calculation from the wake calculation and use wake models calibrated to a single turbine in isolation.…”
Section: Wind Plant Flow Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often not possible to measure the wind speed and direction at the hub height. Computer simulation tools are developed to evaluate the wind conditions at hub height over a certain area from a point wind measurement with the local influences and obstacles [156][157][158].…”
Section: Wind Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying them to non-uniform flow field will lead to additional error. Crespo et al has developed the UPMWAKE model and the UPMPARK model in which atmospheric boundary layer is taken into account, but they may not work for complicated topography [26]. The generalized actuator disk model, the actuator line model and the actuator surface model are another series of wake models [23,27].…”
Section: Virtual Particle Model For Turbine Wake Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%