2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-013-1427-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on modeling and indexing events in multimedia

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Dieses Dokument darf zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern für das Dokument eine Open-Content-Lizenz verwendet wurde, so gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use:This document may be saved and copie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides copy-move forgery detection, our method can also be applied to solve other problems in computer vision, such as video event detection [13] and multimedia indexing [23]. For example, when the targets of interest are small objects with non-textured appearances, our method can be applied to efficiently locate these small smooth regions and construct corresponding features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides copy-move forgery detection, our method can also be applied to solve other problems in computer vision, such as video event detection [13] and multimedia indexing [23]. For example, when the targets of interest are small objects with non-textured appearances, our method can be applied to efficiently locate these small smooth regions and construct corresponding features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be classified in two groups: event clustering approaches [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and event hybrid approaches [12,14,17,21,27,28]. Extracting events from multimedia in terms of photographs or images is much more difficult when compared to text for essentially two reasons: i) Event detection from images requires aggregation of heterogeneous metadata [29]; ii) Linking multimedia data to event model aspects is far more challenging then textual data [30]. In fact, many aspects of an event should be taken into consideration, as described in the multimedia event model presented in [13], such as time, space, actors, granularities, sub-events, etc.…”
Section: B Event Detection From Multimediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the modeling process must consider which sensor data models it, and how to model the interaction between events. Three different aspects of interaction have been identified in the literature, as summarized in [150]: 1) mereological referring to the part-of relation between events [130] that means that an event can be composed of different sub-events, 2) causality, referring to the fact that events can be classified in cause events or effect events [94,151], 3) correlation, referring to the relationship between two or more events having common cause [157].…”
Section: Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%