2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey strategies to quantify and optimize detecting probability of a CO2 seep in a varying marine environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fields represent the input needed in the monitor design framework presented in Hvidevold et al . [] and Frøysa [].…”
Section: Seep Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These fields represent the input needed in the monitor design framework presented in Hvidevold et al . [] and Frøysa [].…”
Section: Seep Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If for instance two sensors have overlapping detection areas, the efficiency of the layout might not be optimal. This leads to the optimization problem of finding the optimal sensor layout maximizing the detection probability [ Hvidevold et al ., ; Frøysa , ].…”
Section: Consequences For Designing a Monitoring Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hvidevold et al . [] presented a procedure for optimizing placement of fixed sensors on the seafloor that accounts for footprint anisotropy. The same tracer footprint predictions, consisting of time series in an array of 51 × 51 grid points around the seep location from the GCM simulations presented in Ali et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%