2018
DOI: 10.3354/esr00880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveys of environmental DNA (eDNA): a new approach to estimate occurrence in Vulnerable manatee populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of ddPCR™ for single species detections is gaining popularity in eDNA research due to its unparalleled ability to detect minute quantities of target DNA amongst high concentrations of non-target DNA and in the presence of natural inhibitors found in water samples (Evans et al 2017; Hunter et al 2018). DdPCR™ assays developed for species such as the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas (Schweiss et al In Press) and Killer Whale, Orcinus orca (Baker et al 2018), have found this platform to be capable of detecting less than 0.5 pg of target DNA in a reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of ddPCR™ for single species detections is gaining popularity in eDNA research due to its unparalleled ability to detect minute quantities of target DNA amongst high concentrations of non-target DNA and in the presence of natural inhibitors found in water samples (Evans et al 2017; Hunter et al 2018). DdPCR™ assays developed for species such as the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas (Schweiss et al In Press) and Killer Whale, Orcinus orca (Baker et al 2018), have found this platform to be capable of detecting less than 0.5 pg of target DNA in a reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DdPCR™ assays developed for species such as the Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas (Schweiss et al In Press) and Killer Whale, Orcinus orca (Baker et al 2018), have found this platform to be capable of detecting less than 0.5 pg of target DNA in a reaction. Such highly sensitive assays are especially critical in eDNA surveys targeting Critically Endangered or Endangered species, where there can be substantial conservation outcomes based on the results of such surveys (Hunter et al 2018; Poulakis and Grubbs 2019). For instance, the use of ddPCR™ could reduce the risk of false negatives (i.e., where target DNA is present but not detected) stemming from the use of a less sensitive PCR platform such as conventional or qRT-PCR, which are unlikely to detect such minute quantities of target DNA (Doi et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although occupancy modelling is widely used in wildlife studies, applications of occupancy models to eDNA studies have been limited. However, an increasing number of studies have recently applied occupancy modelling successfully to detection/non-detection data obtained through eDNA analyses (Ficetola et al, 2015;Hunter et al, 2018;Pilliod, Goldberg, Arkle, & Waits, 2013;Schmelzle & Kinziger, 2016;Schmidt, Kery, Ursenbacher, Hyman, & Collins, 2013;Wineland et al, 2019). Based on these first eDNA occupancy studies Dorazio and Erickson (2018) recently developed an R package ednaoccupancy, which makes use of a multi-scale occupancy framework (Nichols et al, 2008), and accounts for the varying detection probabilities at different hierarchical levels (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy has the potential to help researchers identify the geographic ranges of vulnerable species. Hunter and her team also designed primers for amplifying a region of manatee DNA from water samples (8). Earlier this year, in a proof-ofconcept study, they reported that this eDNA test for three species of manatee offered a higher probability of detecting the animals than did traditional aerial surveys (8).…”
Section: Protecting Threatened Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%