2007
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.2.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and invasiveness of astrocytomas promoted by erythropoietin

Abstract: Hypoxia-inducible autocrine and paracrine EPO signaling participates in the malignant progression of GBMs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
21
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
21
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, EPO did not promote tumor growth in nude mice after subcutaneous transplantation of another glioma cell line, HTZ11 (22). In some contrast with the present findings, EPO was reported to promote invasiveness of glioma cells under basal conditions (27). This discrepant result may be explained by the use of a different glioma cell line (U251) and a different assay system (matrigel invasion chamber), but most importantly of a high dose of EPO (27), which cannot be expected to be reached in the brain on peripheral application.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, EPO did not promote tumor growth in nude mice after subcutaneous transplantation of another glioma cell line, HTZ11 (22). In some contrast with the present findings, EPO was reported to promote invasiveness of glioma cells under basal conditions (27). This discrepant result may be explained by the use of a different glioma cell line (U251) and a different assay system (matrigel invasion chamber), but most importantly of a high dose of EPO (27), which cannot be expected to be reached in the brain on peripheral application.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In some contrast with the present findings, EPO was reported to promote invasiveness of glioma cells under basal conditions (27). This discrepant result may be explained by the use of a different glioma cell line (U251) and a different assay system (matrigel invasion chamber), but most importantly of a high dose of EPO (27), which cannot be expected to be reached in the brain on peripheral application. In fact, the concentrations used in the present study were chosen according to data on penetration of EPO over the blood-brain barrier (7,41).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, further studies are needed with more specific antibodies and greater sample numbers to determine the prognostic significance of EpoR expression on tumors. The biological effects of Epo stimulation of tumor cells is still debated with reports of enhanced survival (8,11), proliferation (4,6,(38)(39)(40), resistance to treatment (38,41,42), tumor angiogenesis (43)(44)(45), chemotaxis (46), invasion (47)(48)(49)(50), and migration (40,46,51). Others have reported no discernible effects of Epo (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytotoxic effect of these two agents is reduced by EPO in vitro [39] . EPO also promotes the growth and the survival of astrocytoma cells in vitro, as it acts against the cytotoxic effect of chemical agents, such as cisplatin [40] . EPO acts cytoprotectively and prevents apoptosis of ischemic heart through activation of the JAK/STAT and RAS/MAPK pathways through cardiac AKT activity [41] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%