Survival benefit of conversion surgery for patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer who responded favorably to nonsurgical treatment

Self Cite

Background and Aim Effective multidisciplinary approaches for unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR‐PC) that include modern chemotherapeutic regimens and subsequent conversion surgery (CS) are being developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients clinically diagnosed with UR‐PC, focusing on the efficacy of CS. Methods Patients ineligible for two multicenter phase II studies conducted by the Hokkaido Pancreatic Cancer Study Group (HOPS) were recruited. Sequential treatment regimens, conversion to radical surgery, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)‐based UR factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of OS. Results Sixty‐six of 247 intended recruits for HOPS studies from October 2013 to April 2016 were included. Unresectability was due to locally advanced (LA) disease and metastasis (M) in 42 and 24 patients, respectively. Induction therapy began with chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in 44 and 17 patients, respectively, of whom 23 received modern CT regimens. Radical surgery was completed in 12 (LA, 10; M, two) with a median treatment interval of 10.3 months (range, 2‐32). Eleven patients (91.6%) achieved pathological R0 resection. Median OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent CS than those who did not (44.1 vs 14.5 months, P < 0.0001). CS was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio, 0.078; 95% confident interval, 0.017‐0.348; P = 0.001). Conclusion Conversion surgery after a favorable response to sequential treatment might prolong survival in patients with UR‐PC. Precise diagnosis on MDCT followed by sequential multimodal anticancer treatment is essential.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical usefulness of conversion surgery for unresectable pancreatic cancer diagnosed on multidetector computed tomography imaging: Results from a multicenter observational cohort study by the Hokkaido Pancreatic Cancer Study Group (HOPS UR‐01)

Kimura

Nakamura

Hayashi

et al. 2019

Self Cite

“…For neoadjuvant for UR and BR PDAC including the concept of "conversion surgery," several reports demonstrated longer duration of the treatment before surgery. [58][59][60] Longer duration of neoadjuvant would be necessary; therefore, an accurate assessment of response using appropriate surrogate markers to decide on treatment continuation would be essential to avoid detrimental elongation of the treatment. 61 and rectum.…”

Section: Op Timal Dur Ati On For Neoadj U Vantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: What is the best protocol?

Motoi

Unno

2020

Although upfront surgery has been the gold standard for pancreatic adenocarcinoma that is planned for resection, it should be compared with the alternative strategy of neoadjuvant therapy. Despite the many reports of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy, most of them were not comparative. Recently Prep‐02/JSAP05 study clearly demonstrated the significant survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over upfront surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma that is planned for resection. These findings opened a new chapter of neoadjuvant therapy. Ongoing trials are expected to confirm the evidence. This review summarizes the past, present, and future perspectives of neoadjuvant therapy and its optimization.

Surgical indication for and desirable outcomes of conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Satoi

Yamamoto

Yamaki

et al. 2019

Aim of this review is to propose an acceptable surgical indication for conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by considering desirable outcomes, including resectability, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was conducted through July 15, 2019. Eligible studies were those reporting on patients with UR-PDAC who underwent surgery. We excluded case reports with fewer than 10 patients, insufficient descriptions of survival data, and palliative surgery.When patients with UR-PDAC with no progression after chemo(radiation) therapy were offered surgical exploration, resectability and median survival time (MST) of those who underwent conversion surgery ranged from 20% to 69% (median, 52%) and from 19.5 to 33 months (median, 21.9 months), respectively. When conversion surgery was carried out in patients with expected margin-negative resection or with clinical response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), resectability and MST ranged from 18% to 27% (median, 20%) and from 21 to 35.3 months (median, 30 months), respectively. Among patients who underwent conversion surgery based on clinical response and decreased CA19-9 level after multimodal treatment, resectability and MST ranged from 2% to 24% (median, 4.1%) and from 24.1 to 64 months (median, 36 months), respectively. Decreased CA19-9 level was a predictor of resectability, OS and DFS by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, decision-making for conversion surgery based on clinical response and decreased CA19-9 level after multimodal treatment may be appropriate. With regard to desirable outcomes of OS and DFS, conversion surgery may provide improved survival for patients with initial UR-PDAC. K E Y W O R D Sconversion surgery, overall survival, resectability, surgical indication, unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | 7 SATOI eT Al.