2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00832.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of Bowhead Whales, Balaena mysticetus, Estimated from 1981-1998 Photoidentification Data

Abstract: Annual survival probability of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, was estimated using both Bayesian and maximum likelihood implementations of Cormack and Jolly-Seber (JS) models for capture-recapture estimation in open populations and reduced-parameter generalizations of these models. Aerial photographs of naturally marked bowheads collected between 1981 and 1998 provided the data. The marked whales first photographed in a particular year provided the initial 'capture' and 'release' of those marked whales and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of both trends is not known. This value lies in the range of other baleen whale species such as bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus, for which a survival rate of 0.984 was estimated (Zeh et al 2002). Best & Kishino (1998) presented similar values for reproductively active southern right whale females Eubalaena australis.…”
Section: Survival Ratesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The magnitude of both trends is not known. This value lies in the range of other baleen whale species such as bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus, for which a survival rate of 0.984 was estimated (Zeh et al 2002). Best & Kishino (1998) presented similar values for reproductively active southern right whale females Eubalaena australis.…”
Section: Survival Ratesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Caswell et al (1999) estimated survival of the highly endangered western North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis population, but these time-varying markrecapture estimates (from about 0.99 to about 0.94) are of crude survival and are not directly comparable to the non-calf survival estimate presented here. Likewise, a mark-recapture survival estimate for adult bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus of the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Seas stock (0.984, SD = 0.014; Zeh et al 2002) and indirect survival estimates for adult female southern right whales Eubalaena australis off South Africa (0.986, 95% CI = 0.976 to 0.999; Best et al 2001) and Argentina (0.981, SE = 0.005; Cooke et al 2001) are not directly comparable. Finally, the western gray whale non-calf survival point estimate is lower than an indirect estimate of 0.987 (90% credibility interval = 0.972 to 0.998) by Wade & Perryman (2002) for the eastern gray whale population.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these data, factors that influence the decision of which data set to use include the sample size, the distribution of photographic quality categories, and the variability in the evaluation of photographic quality. The decision of which data to include will be even more complex for populations where the ability to correctly reidentify individuals is reduced because not all individuals are distinctively marked, for example, bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) (Rugh et al 1998, da Silva et al 2000, Zeh et al 2002, bottlenose dolphins (Wilson et al 1999, Read et al 2003, and Mediterranean monk seals (Forcada and Aguilar 2000).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo-identification has been used in a number of capture-recapture studies to estimate animal abundance and survival rates of several species (e.g., Buckland 1990, Hammond et al 1990, Flatt et al 1997, Langtimm et al 1998, Baker 1999, Zeh et al 2002, Calambokidis and Barlow 2004, Mizroch et al 2004. When photo-identification is used in capture-recapture studies, the ability to accurately identify individuals from photographs needs to be examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%