2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of non-seminomatous germ cell cancer patients according to the IGCC classification: An update based on meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As our patient quickly progressed to respiratory failure and, as a result, we were not able to administer the recommended chemotherapy. However, the IGCCCG reported that the fiveyear overall survival rate for patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors with a poor-prognosis was 48%, but it was more recently reported at 71% (15). As such, there has been a large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our patient quickly progressed to respiratory failure and, as a result, we were not able to administer the recommended chemotherapy. However, the IGCCCG reported that the fiveyear overall survival rate for patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors with a poor-prognosis was 48%, but it was more recently reported at 71% (15). As such, there has been a large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4 van Dijk et al carried out a meta-analysis based on 1775 cases of NSGCT treated after 1987, and estimated the 5-year OS of poor-prognosis cases as 71%. 5 Because of such progress in treatment outcomes, several investigators have proposed a new model to identify a high-risk group (so-called "very poor" cases) among poor-progno-sis cases. [6][7][8] Although such a new pretreatment prognostic classification has not been established, it is notable that a mediastinal primary site is the most powerful indicator for a poor prognosis in those analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to assess renal function by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), detection and management of factors causing progression of CKD, such as hypertension and proteinuria, are recommended for CKD patients and those with a high risk for CKD. 3 The findings of this study 2 suggest that urologists and oncologists should consider this matter in follow up for testicular cancer patients after chemotherapy. The currently used equation for eGFR tends to underestimate GFR and potentially misclassify patients with measured GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 into CKD stage 3.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 Furthermore, in the past decade, there has been a clear trend toward improvement of survival for all risk groups; in particular, there has been a large improvement in survival rates for patients with a poor prognosis. 2 Therefore, the assessment of long-term morbidity is important when considering the life expectancy of this group of young men. 3 The morbidities include secondary malignant neoplasms, neuropathy, gonadal dysfunction, cardiovascular disease and nephrotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%