1992
DOI: 10.1093/jee/85.1.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of Cacopsylla pyri and C. pyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae) to Avermectin B1 Applied Topically and as Residues on Pear Foliage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test carried out with abamectin showed that it was approximately as effective as that of the laboratory strain (resistance rate = 0.7). The LC 50 obtained on C. pyri after 24 h was similar to that obtained by Etienne (1992) on P. pyricola after 72 h with avermectin B1. Amitraz had a resistance rate of 4.7‐fold, but this insecticide is known to have a predominantly larvicidal activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The test carried out with abamectin showed that it was approximately as effective as that of the laboratory strain (resistance rate = 0.7). The LC 50 obtained on C. pyri after 24 h was similar to that obtained by Etienne (1992) on P. pyricola after 72 h with avermectin B1. Amitraz had a resistance rate of 4.7‐fold, but this insecticide is known to have a predominantly larvicidal activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%