2003
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.9.5109-5117.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of Mink ( Mustera vision )-Derived Cells to Replication by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Abstract: In vivo studies for understanding viral transmission and replication, host immune responses, and pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection would greatly benefit from the establishment of a small-animal model. In this study, we explored the potential of American mink (Mustera vison) as a susceptible host. We found that primary cells and cell lines derived from this species efficiently supported trans-activation of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat by Tat. Accordingly, the cysteine resid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coexpression of hCD4 and hCCR5 in SIRC cells and primary macrophages mediated envelope-specific and coreceptor-dependent virion entry. These results agree with reports that surface expression of the human binding receptor and one of the major chemokine coreceptors is sufficient to overcome the entry block in cells from diverse primate and small-animal species (8,16,42,43,45,49,54,76).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Coexpression of hCD4 and hCCR5 in SIRC cells and primary macrophages mediated envelope-specific and coreceptor-dependent virion entry. These results agree with reports that surface expression of the human binding receptor and one of the major chemokine coreceptors is sufficient to overcome the entry block in cells from diverse primate and small-animal species (8,16,42,43,45,49,54,76).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While the VLPs clearly released Lv1 restriction in the rhesus macaque cells as anticipated, they had no effect in ferret cells. which was verified in repeated experiments, is at variance with a prior report (35). As was discussed previously (62), it may be possible to reconcile these differences by considering that a single round of provirus generation and p24 production occurred in the experiments of Koito et al (35).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Additional barriers have been reported in the late steps of the viral life cycle (11,27,40,42,43,53). These late-stage defects can be rescued by fusing HIV-1-infected rodent cells to uninfected human cells (11,52), indicating that the defects are due to the lack of necessary factors in rodent cells rather than the presence of dominant inhibitors of HIV-1 replication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%