1991
DOI: 10.1016/0077-7579(91)90017-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspended-matter particle size in some west-European estuaries; part I: Particle-size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in salt concentration decreases the particles' charge and, therefore, would lead to an increase in the floc size; however, this is not always observed in situ. While van Leussen (1999) measured, in the Ems estuary, an increase of the floc size for increasing salinity, Eisma et al (1991) observed a decrease of the floc size for increasing salinity. Burt (1986) carried out a large series of floc size measurements at different salinities within the Thames estuary, but could not find any correlation between salinity and floc size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in salt concentration decreases the particles' charge and, therefore, would lead to an increase in the floc size; however, this is not always observed in situ. While van Leussen (1999) measured, in the Ems estuary, an increase of the floc size for increasing salinity, Eisma et al (1991) observed a decrease of the floc size for increasing salinity. Burt (1986) carried out a large series of floc size measurements at different salinities within the Thames estuary, but could not find any correlation between salinity and floc size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Junge distributions for marine particles has been criticized (Risovic 2002;Stavn and Keen 2004;Chami et al 2006). Although some field measurements carried out in coastal waters suggest PSDs close to a power-law distribution (Boss et al 2001a), others reveal significant features at any size range on top of a power-law PSD (Bale and Morris 1987;Eisma et al 1991;Bernard et al 2001). Note also that current particle-sizing techniques for discrete and in situ sampling, such as the resistive particle-counting technique (e.g., Coulter counter) or laser diffraction (e.g., the LISST series, Sequoia Scientific), are typically limited to the range 1-200 mm (Agrawal and Pottsmith 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaju et al 1989, Billington 1991, others using optical properties of the sample, e.g. underwater photography (Eisma et al 1990(Eisma et al , 1991 . .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the volume of POM and the particle size are difficult to measure. The CoulterQP Counter, widely used for estimating particle volumes (Vanderploeg et al 1987, Gaju et al 1989, Billington 1991, Eisma et al 1991, fails to detect detritus, and above all it cannot detect the electrolytecontaining carbohydrate matrix of aggregates in plankton samples properly (Boyd & Johnson 1995). Alternative methods for quantifying particle volume and size distributions are microscopic techniques combined with 2-and 3-dimensional image analysis (Psenner 1993, Verity & Sieracki 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%