2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability assessments of cooperative vehicle intersection control at an urban corridor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important finding of this research was the high correlation between the frequency of deceleration rates (below 4.86 m/s 2 ) and the observed crash rates. Lee et al (2013) estimated the number of traffic conflicts using VISSIM and SSAM to investigate safety impacts of the Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control (CVIC) algorithm that allows drivers passing through urban coordinated intersections in an arterial without stopping at any traffic signals. This study concluded that the CVIC system would reduce the number of rear-end crash conflicts events by 30-87%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important finding of this research was the high correlation between the frequency of deceleration rates (below 4.86 m/s 2 ) and the observed crash rates. Lee et al (2013) estimated the number of traffic conflicts using VISSIM and SSAM to investigate safety impacts of the Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control (CVIC) algorithm that allows drivers passing through urban coordinated intersections in an arterial without stopping at any traffic signals. This study concluded that the CVIC system would reduce the number of rear-end crash conflicts events by 30-87%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept is widely accepted by researchers for its efficiency improvements (throughput, average delay, etc. )and many improved approaches are proposed [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], which can be categorized into planning-based approaches [9][10][11][12] and hybrid approaches [13][14][15][16][17]. 1) Planning-based approaches…”
Section: Intersection Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of planning method is to generate trajectories for all cars, which is a great challenge to the computing capability of intelligent intersection. J. Lee et al [12] argued trajectory generation is a complex large-scale nonlinear constrained optimization problem that can be performed using optimization methods, such as Active-set Method [18], Interior Point Method [18] and Genetic Algorithm [19]. Dresner and Stone [9] modeled a "reservation based" approach to intersection management enabled by driverless technology.…”
Section: Intersection Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by taking advantage of the rapid emergence of Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs) [14,15,16,17], it has become feasible to automate routing decisions, thus solving a system-centric forward problem in which all CAVs (bypassing driver decisions) cooperate to optimize the overall system performance. Second, we propose a modification to existing GPS navigation algorithms recommending to all drivers socially optimal routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%