2018
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1491777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability criteria for the selection of water supply pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub-criteria related to the environmental impact belonged to the latter. Maiolo et al (2018), to select the best type of water pipes applicable in particular soil conditions, conducted a thorough LCA (cradle to gate) of 10 products offered in the market using Impact 2002+ methodology, assuming Western European conditions. Then they combined its overall measure of environmental profile with the coefficient capturing mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub-criteria related to the environmental impact belonged to the latter. Maiolo et al (2018), to select the best type of water pipes applicable in particular soil conditions, conducted a thorough LCA (cradle to gate) of 10 products offered in the market using Impact 2002+ methodology, assuming Western European conditions. Then they combined its overall measure of environmental profile with the coefficient capturing mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Figure3 is evident that the greatest contribution is related to human health [34]. It is associated a high environmental cost to polymeric materials (PRFV and PVC), whereas the iron cast and gres pipes have smaller impact.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment Of the Reuse Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight PVC pipe reduces transportation costs and affects the climate while also simplifying pipe handling on-site [35]. For a pipe with a diameter of 300 mm, PVC is 10, CI is 68, PE is 11.5 kg/m [59], and AC is 27.4 kg/m [60].…”
Section: Pipe Weight and Portabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%