Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line

Abstract

As one of the most prominent industries in developed and developing countries, the construction industry has had substantial impacts on different aspects of the environment, society, and economy. In recent years, sustainable construction has been introduced as an approach to evaluate the various construction phases based on environmental, economic, and social dimensions, also known as the triple bottom line (TBL). To conduct a sustainability analysis of the buildings in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, two conventional construction frames were selected, namely steel frame and concrete frame. In this research, three conventional approaches for the evaluation of the TBL, namely the life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA), were, respectively, used for the study of environmental, economic, and social impacts. The main results of the study are summarized as the following: Overall, based on the LCA results, the concrete frame led to almost 38% more environmental pollution than steel frame. In terms of the total prices of the buildings, considering their LCC and with respect to the present value (PV) method, the steel frame was almost 152,000 USD more expensive than the concrete frame. The quantified results of the social dimension by the SLCA method showed that concrete and steel buildings had a score of 0.199 and 0.189, respectively, which indicates that concrete had a slightly better social performance based on expert opinions. A multi-criteria assessment and sensitivity analysis of the results were conducted by a graphical tool, namely the mixing triangle, and showed that the overall preference of each alternative depends mainly on the importance weights given to each aspect of the assessment. However, one of the main findings of the research was that overall, giving a high importance weight to environmental dimension leads to sustainability preference of steel over concrete frame, while giving high importance weights to economic or social dimensions leads to sustainability preference of concrete over steel frame. Findings of the study are beneficial to decision-makers in the construction industry since they can decide on the best alternative among concrete and steel frames based on their strategies.

OSH Performance within TQM Application in Construction Companies: A Qualitative Study in Saudi Arabia

“…The simultaneous integration of these three elements is required to determine sustainable development in the built environment effectively [31]. Therefore, the construction industry can be considered one of the most notable in sustainable development because it has a crucial influence on the TBL [32], and is critical to the sustainable development framework, affecting the three dimensions of the TBL: social, economic, and environmental [33]. The social dimension involves community participation, fair wages, and employee relations, with emphasis on the interaction between the firm in question and society [34].…”

Ensuring the Safety of Steel Moment Frames Subjected to Uncertain Impacts

“…This aspect was taken as a benchmark when a steel moment frame was selected for the case study. The main provisions of [38] stand for this decision. Of some interest is the lifecycle of a structure, taking into account the impact perception to be evaluated using the methodology provided in [39], based on (a), relaxed-tensioned cables (b) [30], prestressed joint with energy dissipating elements (c) [31], and supplementary frame structure (d) [32].…”

Intervention Works Conducted to Ensure the Stability of a Slope: A Sustainability Study

“…The construction industry, as one of the most important industries in both developed and developing countries, has had a significant impact on various aspects of the environment, economy, and society. Sustainable construction has been introduced as a technique to assess the different stages of construction in recent years, in terms of social, economic, and environmental dimensions, also referred to as the three bottom lines (TBL) [3]. Energy demand and consumption have increased rapidly in recent years as a result of humankind's ever-increasing needs in the economy, industries, and agriculture [4].…”