2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-012-0121-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability indicators for livestock farming. A review

Abstract: International audienceIntensive livestock farming has raised issues about environmental impacts and food security during the past 20 years. As a consequence, there is a strong social demand for sustainable livestock systems. Sustainable livestock systems should indeed be environmentally friendly, economically viable for farmers, and socially acceptable, notably for animal welfare. For that goal, many sustainability indicators and methods have been developed at the farm level. The main challenge is using a tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
205
0
23

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
205
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The farm scale is the main management level and economic unit, at which decisions, strategic choices and technical actions are performed by the farmer to produce goods and services (Lebacq et al, 2013;Botreau et al, 2014). At this level, such actions could allow the farmer to improve the economic and environmental sustainability of the farm.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The farm scale is the main management level and economic unit, at which decisions, strategic choices and technical actions are performed by the farmer to produce goods and services (Lebacq et al, 2013;Botreau et al, 2014). At this level, such actions could allow the farmer to improve the economic and environmental sustainability of the farm.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method allows the differences among groups of individuals (here, the EA classes) to be characterised through simultaneously considering several quantitative variables measured on these individuals (here, the sustainability indicators) (Cruz-Castillo et al, 1994). To perform this analysis, we used a set of sustainability indicators (Supplementary Table S1) selected according to the process described by Lebacq et al (2013). In order to identify differences among classes according to sustainability performance, we excluded from this set all indicators linked to farm structure, such as stocking rate, permanent grassland area and economic specialisation.…”
Section: Ea Classes and Comparison Among Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…creation of landscape and reduction of pollution). Social sustainability, as defined by Lebacq et al (2013), relates to the well-being of farmers and their families, in relation to (i) education; (ii) working conditions, measured by working time, workload (including health) and workforce; and (iii) quality of life, measured by isolation and social involvement. There is a growing recognition of the need to examine overall human well-being and quality of life within the sustainability framework (Elkington, 1999;McKenzie, 2004;Littig and Griessler, 2005;Pilgeram, 2011).…”
Section: Social Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of indicators should be able to reflect the current environmental state of the system comprehensively and reliably (Lebacq et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provide insight into the major environmental impacts of the dairy farming systems (Bélanger et al, 2012). Exploring correlations between various indicators can help to identify such a set of indicators (Lebacq et al, 2013). Previous studies have mainly focused on correlations between indicators within LCA and for non-dairy related products (e.g.…”
Section: Knowledge Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%