2012
DOI: 10.1108/09696471211190374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability, organizational learning, and lessons learned from aviation

Abstract: Purpose -While the importance of organizational learning for sustainability has been stressed by a number of authors in the literature, the practicalities of how organizational leaders might foster such learning are seldom treated. This paper seeks to demonstrate that there is much that could be learned from the aviation industry about organizational learning practice that could be gainfully applied by organizations in attempting to address the demands of triple bottom line sustainability. Design/methodology/a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gap 3: The organisational learning literature lacks conceptual tools to explain the dynamics linking organisational learning, organisational performance, and the common good. The organisational learning literature is converging on the idea that an evolutionary approach is necessary to explain the possible positive and negative links between organisational learning and organisational performance, on the one side, and the common good, on the other side (Aldrich & Ruef, 2006;Crossan et al, 2011;Nelson & Winter, 2002;Pourdehnad & Smith, 2012;Zollo, Cennamo, & Neumann, 2013). A similar trend is observable in the knowledge management literature (Cheng, Niu, & Niu, 2014;Ford, Myrden, & Jones, 2015;Labedz, Cavaleri, & Berry, 2011;Manning & von Hagen, 2010;Parent, Roy, & St-Jacques, 2007;Sherif, 2006).…”
Section: Gaps To Be Addressed For An Ecosystem Theory Of Organisationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Gap 3: The organisational learning literature lacks conceptual tools to explain the dynamics linking organisational learning, organisational performance, and the common good. The organisational learning literature is converging on the idea that an evolutionary approach is necessary to explain the possible positive and negative links between organisational learning and organisational performance, on the one side, and the common good, on the other side (Aldrich & Ruef, 2006;Crossan et al, 2011;Nelson & Winter, 2002;Pourdehnad & Smith, 2012;Zollo, Cennamo, & Neumann, 2013). A similar trend is observable in the knowledge management literature (Cheng, Niu, & Niu, 2014;Ford, Myrden, & Jones, 2015;Labedz, Cavaleri, & Berry, 2011;Manning & von Hagen, 2010;Parent, Roy, & St-Jacques, 2007;Sherif, 2006).…”
Section: Gaps To Be Addressed For An Ecosystem Theory Of Organisationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Perusahaan X sebagai perusahaan baru, saat ini berusaha untuk membangun sistem yang ada di dalam perusahaan. Pembelajaran organisasi penting diterapkan di perusahaan berbasis aviasi, karena melalui pembelajaran tersebut dapat meningkatkan performa kinerja karyawan, yang berdampak pada peningkatan secara signifikan pada kepuasan dan keselamatan perjalanan dari konsumennya; dimana dengan pembelajaran organisasi yang baik dapat mengubah proses kerja internal perusahaan menjadi lebih efektif dan dapat mengubah cara berpikir karyawan agar sejalan dengan visi dan misi perusahaan (Pourdehnad & Smith, 2012). Selain itu, dengan usia yang muda dan adanya persaingan dengan perusahaan sejenis, pembelajaran di dalam organisasi dapat membantu perusahaan untuk dapat bersaing dan membantu keberlangsungan organisasi dalam waktu Panjang (Smith, 2012).…”
Section: Diskusiunclassified
“…The level of capability an organization has to readily adapt itself to what is needed to survive and thrive in the environment is an indication of organizational enhancement and, finally, organizational success [29,30]. Such characteristics include creating clarity in the organization (characteristics 5, 13), embedding supporting processes for aligning, coordinating and facilitating collaboration between units (6,7,8,9), instigating cross-functional events and initiatives where people can interact (10,11), making sure conflicts between units can be resolved quickly (12), and putting information systems in place to enable and facilitate information sharing and communication across the organization (14,15). Silo-busting factor 3 is described as 'collaborative environment', as this factor contains characteristics that relate to fostering a collaborative mind-set, focus, behavior, and culture in the organization.…”
Section: Silo-busting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more complex, dynamic, and turbulent an organization's environment is, the more necessary organizational learning is considered to be [4]. A main source of organizational learning is the exchange of knowledge between the various parts of an organization [7]. Unfortunately, many organizations experience some form of 'silo working', be it across vertical divisions or departments, or teams within horizontal functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%