2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-1696-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable design of rural roads with 2+1 road design: Levels of service and traffic flow performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e lack of physical carriers is due to a lower relative importance of head-on collisions. e same motivation was present in South Korea [15] and Missouri, US [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…e lack of physical carriers is due to a lower relative importance of head-on collisions. e same motivation was present in South Korea [15] and Missouri, US [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2 + 1 roads can operate safely and effectively in areas where minor intersections and driveways provide direct access to the roadway. However, split level intersections could be preferred at the highest functional class of 2 + 1 highways, like for German EKL1 [1] Germany [14] 1,070-1,600 For directional traffic volume of 700 veh/h Germany [3] 600-1,2000 Should not exceed 4,000 m Denmark [27] 1,000-2,000 Recommended value of 1,500 m Norway [28] 1,000-2,000 Depends on AADT [15] 800-1,500 - Advances in Civil Engineering or at relatively high traffic flows in the UK [32]. is decision was taken because the observed 2 + 1 highways with split level intersections had the most favorable accident cost rates and the most uniform speed levels [34] because at-grade intersections force drivers to reduce speed or even to stop.…”
Section: Intersections and Access Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations