2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable energy technologies for energy saving and carbon emission reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three input indicators for measuring LCEE (Chang et al, ; Wang, Zhao, Tsutsumi, & You, ), namely, x 1 total labour force (TLF), x 2 gross national expenditure (GNE), and x 3 total energy use (TEU), where TLF indicates the number of people (aged 15 years and above), TEU refers to the use of primary energy before transformation to other end‐use fuels. GDP is used as desirable output.…”
Section: Data Source and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three input indicators for measuring LCEE (Chang et al, ; Wang, Zhao, Tsutsumi, & You, ), namely, x 1 total labour force (TLF), x 2 gross national expenditure (GNE), and x 3 total energy use (TEU), where TLF indicates the number of people (aged 15 years and above), TEU refers to the use of primary energy before transformation to other end‐use fuels. GDP is used as desirable output.…”
Section: Data Source and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four carbon reduction strategies focus in building materials and processes in building fabrication were proposed and evaluated to contribute to climate change mitigation. As it was shown through the text, and analyzed by Wang [53], building technology plays an important role in determining building energy efficiency and consumption.…”
Section: Carbon Reduction Strategies and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect that concerns in building practitioners are that the cost and externalities, as pointed out Wang [53], they highlight that many firms are concerned that the climate change mitigation technologies and strategies may be associated with excessive costs and/or disruptions of business operations, and their burdens outweigh the operational and climate benefits. In this sense, Poveda and Young [55] argued that if it pays to be green, constructers firms can achieve win-win in both environmental and operational dimensions, because environmental pressures provide constructors firms with an opportunity to improve efficiency and competitiveness through environmental innovations in processes and products.…”
Section: Carbon Reduction Strategies and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESERS models can indicate various sophisticated issues, such as energy-saving and emission-reduction, economic growth, carbon emissions, carbon tax, energy intensity, energy efficiency and so on, in a regional energy system [14,20]. By analyzing the reciprocal causation of these factors, the improvements on energy efficiency, energy intensity and greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved to promote the energy structure transformation and transition to a low-carbon economy [12,13]. Most notably, Tian LX et al proposed a three-dimensional model of the ESERS in [17] considering the complicated relationship between energy-saving and emission-reduction, economic growth and carbon emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lots of work has been done to demonstrate the impacts of carbon emissions and economic growth on energy consumption [2,5,6,[12][13][14][15][16]. Besides, different mathematical models of energy-saving and emission-reduction system (ESERS) have been developed in [17][18][19][20] to simulate the nonlinear coupling dynamics of energy conservation, economic growth, carbon emissions, and renewable energy development in the evolutionary process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%