Sustainable service supply chain management: from a systematic literature review to a conceptual framework for performance evaluation of service only supply chain

Abstract

PurposeDespite increasing attentions to sustainable service supply chain management (SSSCM), a framework for performance evaluation of sustainable service only supply chain management (SSOSCM) is still missing. This paper tries to fill this gap and provides a novel conceptual framework.Design/methodology/approachThe articles related to SSSCM are fetched from the databases of SCOPUS and Web of Science. Analysis of 174 articles identified by the systematic literature review is further carried out.FindingsThis research identifies the sustainable practices for service only supply chain (SOSC) as environmental management, social management, economic management, customer management, health, safety and risk management, technical sustainability, institutional sustainability, information and technology management as well as two performance measurement criteria as operational performance and organizational performance. This paper provides a novel conceptual framework for the performance evaluation of SSOSCM. The results call for future exploration in the following three broad directions-(1) customer's perception, involvement and their behaviour towards sustainability in SOSC context; (2) trade-off, incentive mechanism and multilevel evaluation for achieving sustainability in SOSC and (3) sustainability in SOSC from various point of views.Practical implicationsThe managers can use the framework to assess the performance of the organization while researchers can explore the discussed research gaps.Originality/valueThis is the first paper that provides a novel conceptual framework for the performance evaluation of SSOSCM as well as potential future research directions.

The effect of the method of remote work on the supply and supply chains for government services: applied study on the Directorate of Social Solidarity in Cairo governorate

“…This result coincides with the results of the studies (Frieder et al, 2022), (Charalampous et al, 2022), that affirm capabilities and skills of the employees of remote work method in terms of the cooperation among the employees in doing remote work, the ability to strike a balance between life and work, and between the culture and behaviors in the remote work environment (Krajcsak & Kozak, 2022), modifying the remote work environment, the communication and understanding in a virtual environment (Szulc et al, 2022), challenging the overload and time pressures at suitable time (Adise et al, 2021). That coincides with the studies on the disciplines of the supply and supply chains that stress the application the recent approaches in managing the supply and supply chains (Nagariya et al, 2021), promoting the risks management capabilities in the supply chains (Lamboll et al, 2018), motivating the development the green initiatives in doing the logistics, harmony, integration and simplicity in carrying out the logistic procedures. All of them are important factors requiring the capabilities and skills of the employees to be done, (Negi & Negi, 2021).…”

“…The management of the supply chain for the sustainable services depends on the environmental department, social and economic department, customers' department, the department of health, safety and risks, technical sustainability, institutional sustainability, department of information and technology along with measuring the performance (Nagariya et al, 2021). The study (Urciuoli et al, 2014) mentions that, managing the flexibility of the supply chains requires preparing the strategies in line with the governmental procedures followed in the foreign policy, the management of crises, flexible contracts, planning the transportation capabilities, safety stock, and promoting the risks management capabilities (Lamboll et al, 2018).…”

“…How to develop the supply and supply chains according to the recent techniques, innovation and diversity, how to meet the needs too fast, the digital transformation in the supply chains, challenging the redesign of the supply and supply chains et al, 2021) How to build the confidence in the suppliers and customers, challenging the redesign of the supply chains to meet the needs, challenging the social responsibility, and the governance of the performance in the supply chains (Mittal et al, 2018) (Brookbanks & Parry, 2022) (Broomes, 2016) Challenging the innovation in the supply chains to surpass the risks, challenging the realization of flexibility in the green chains, how to improve the supply chains performance during the crises (Laorden et al, 2022) (Mittal & Sinha, 2021) (Dubey et al, 2022) How to apply the modern approaches to the management of the supply and supply chains, challenging the promotion of the risk management capabilities in the supply chains, how to motivate developing the green initiatives in the logistics, harmony, integration and simplicity in implementing the logistic procedures (Nagariya et al, 2021) (Lamboll et al, 2018) (Negi & Negi, 2021 Challenging quality infrastructure in logistics, the cultural, institutional and geographical features, infrastructure frames, organizational frames, organizational culture, and national culture of those providing logistic services for the supply chain, governance and organization, knowledge and skills (Butt & Shah, 2021) (Tukamuhabwa et al, 2021) (Harland et al, 2021)…”

Investigating sustainable development for the COVID-19 vaccine supply chain: a structural equation modelling approach

“…Sustainability focuses on the satisfaction of today's needs without compromising future generations' ability to satisfy their needs . There are three pillars: economic, environmental and social, and the concept of sustainability is informally referred to as profits, the planet and people (Nagariya et al, 2022). There has been an increase in investments in the area of SD by the industries in the near future (Falebita and Koul, 2018).…”

The effect of macroeconomics and supply chain finance (SCF) on profitability: Evidence from manufacturing companies

“…According to the above phenomenon, the manufacturing industry can experience growth or decline in production due to company performance, commonly referred to as financial and non-financial performance. A manufacturing industry's production increases or decreases due to MRPB (Tukamuhabwa et al, 2021;Nagariya et al, 2021;Ashby et al, 2012). MRPB affects performance because it enables the industry to improve its environmental performance, which results in increased revenue, new market opportunities, and share.…”