2019
DOI: 10.1101/849208
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVJedi: Genotyping structural variations with long reads

Abstract: Motivation: Studies on structural variants (SV) are expanding rapidly. As a result, and thanks to third generation sequencing technologies, the number of discovered SVs is increasing, especially in the human genome. At the same time, for several applications such as clinical diagnoses, it is important to genotype newly sequenced individuals on well defined and characterized SVs. Whereas several SV genotypers have been developed for short read data, there is a lack of such dedicated tool to assess whether known… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly inefficient as the bam/cram alignment files need to be assessed twice. Even so, this process can only be achieved by using a few of the existing methods (SVJedi 53 , Sniffles 27 , CuteSV 45 ). Sniffles2 strategy only requires an initial calling and merging to obtain a fully genotyped population-level VCF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly inefficient as the bam/cram alignment files need to be assessed twice. Even so, this process can only be achieved by using a few of the existing methods (SVJedi 53 , Sniffles 27 , CuteSV 45 ). Sniffles2 strategy only requires an initial calling and merging to obtain a fully genotyped population-level VCF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large SVs over 10 Mb and the ones located in centromeres, peri-centromere, and gaps regions of the reference genome were excluded. The remaining 31,659 SVs were then re-genotyped in a pedigree using three genotypers (Sniffles 27 , SVjedi 35 , and LRcaller 36 ) with the reads of PacBio Sequel and ONT. Consensus genotypes (23,891) from at least six of the ten genotype call sets were then determined as the consensus genotype calls for each of the Quartet samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first evaluated the regenotyping performance of cuteSV2 and other state-of-the-art methods (i.e., Sniffles1 [18] , Sniffles2 [19] , and SVJedi [17] ) on a well-known human sample HG002 from the Ashkenazim trio-family group based on the Genome in a Bottle (GiaB) ground truth set (SV v0.6) from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The target SV candidates were integrated from the Ashkenazim trio-family group (i.e., HG002, HG003, and HG004), as detected by PBSV (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbsv).…”
Section: Evaluations On Different Sequencing Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many force calling methods have been developed to achieve accurate SV regenotyping with long-read sequencing technologies. SVJedi [17] is used to filter out the informative alignments to quantify the presence of SV alleles. However, it still lacks high accuracy and only accepts the original reads as input, which requires a large amount of time to accomplish read alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%