2002
DOI: 10.1049/el:20020591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVM-based face verification with feature set of small size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A successful face recognition methodology depends heavily on the particular choice of the features used by the (pattern) classifier [4], [5] .Feature selection in pattern recognition involves the derivation of salient features from the raw input data in order to reduce the amount of data for classification and simultaneously provide prominent information of the original images.Most efforts in the literature have been focused mainly on developing the feature extraction methods [6][7] [8] and employing powerful classifiers such as probabilistic [9] ,Hidden Markov models(HMMS) [10] , neural networks(NNs) [11] [12] and support vector machine(SVM) [13] .…”
Section: ) Appearance-basedwhich Uses Holistic Texture Features Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful face recognition methodology depends heavily on the particular choice of the features used by the (pattern) classifier [4], [5] .Feature selection in pattern recognition involves the derivation of salient features from the raw input data in order to reduce the amount of data for classification and simultaneously provide prominent information of the original images.Most efforts in the literature have been focused mainly on developing the feature extraction methods [6][7] [8] and employing powerful classifiers such as probabilistic [9] ,Hidden Markov models(HMMS) [10] , neural networks(NNs) [11] [12] and support vector machine(SVM) [13] .…”
Section: ) Appearance-basedwhich Uses Holistic Texture Features Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researcher claim the advantage of LDA over PCA but Martez et al [19] illustrates why the PCA perform better than the LDA when the training dataset is non data non-uniformly sampled or number of samples per person is small. (3) Classification by employing powerful classifiers such as neural networks [23], [24], support vector machine (SVM) [26], Euclidean distance classifier [21], Mahalanobis distance classifier [22], Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [25], and extreme learning machine (ELM) [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these methods extracts features to optimally represent faces belong to a class and separate the faces. In the literature it has been found that most efforts are given mainly on developing feature extraction methods and employing powerful classifiers such as Euclidean distance classifier [22], neural networks [23], [24], Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [25], support vector machine (SVM) [26], and extreme learning machine (ELM) [27]. In this paper we don't give the attention on face detection and normalization i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%