2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccct.2010.5640480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVM based methods for arrhythmia classification in ECG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods such as support vector machines (SVM) have been tested to classify ECG arrhythmia detection. Kohli et al [ 8 ] compared three popular SVM algorithms, one-against-one, one-against-all, and fuzzy decision function, and finally concluded that the one-against-one method performs better results when distinguishing the cardiac arrhythmia and grouping them into the correct class. Considering that the artificial neural network (ANN) has the flaw of converging to a local minimum and is prone to overfitting, Walsh [ 9 ] used the support vector machine algorithm to classify the ECG data as it tends towards an optimal margin separation, as the search space constraints define a convex set.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as support vector machines (SVM) have been tested to classify ECG arrhythmia detection. Kohli et al [ 8 ] compared three popular SVM algorithms, one-against-one, one-against-all, and fuzzy decision function, and finally concluded that the one-against-one method performs better results when distinguishing the cardiac arrhythmia and grouping them into the correct class. Considering that the artificial neural network (ANN) has the flaw of converging to a local minimum and is prone to overfitting, Walsh [ 9 ] used the support vector machine algorithm to classify the ECG data as it tends towards an optimal margin separation, as the search space constraints define a convex set.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ANOVA was used to select important characteristics for the classification of heart beats, which outperformed by using 10 fold cross validation with an accuracy of 98.49%. Nasiri et al [27] proposed SVM classifier for the classification of arrhythmias and further SVM is optimized by genetic algorithm by applying best parameter for tuning discriminator function that helps in optimizing SVM.Besides above literature [28] [29][30] also applied SVM for arrhythmia classification. Kumaraswamy et al [31]MIT-BIH arrhythmia database was used to propose a classifier for the classification of heartbeats that are useful for the detection of arrhythmias using Random Forest Tree classifier and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) for discovering R-R intervals as features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary work over the ECG datasets is carried out in [41] using the SVM based methods for detection of arrhythmia with a selection of features based on the principal component analysis [41], [42]. An effective model of classification for arrhythmia patients was proposed that relies on SVM and KNN for handling training model and to enhance accuracy measure, which is attained based on the combination of F-score and SFS (Sequential forward search) in handling the selection features [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%