2018
DOI: 10.7326/m17-2145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swan, Ganz, and Their Catheter: Its Evolution Over the Past Half Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronic HF was diagnosed according to the HF guidelines. 12,13 Inclusion criteria for patients in this study: (1) the presence of symptoms and/or signs of HF; (2) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) > 125 pg/ml; (3) abnormal findings of echocardiography. Patients who had revascularization or acute coronary syndrome within 7 days prior, had acute pulmonary embolism, had large pericardial effusion or constrictive pericarditis leading to cardiac tamponade, had septic shock, had hypertensive crisis, were receiving mechanical circulatory support or were acutely decompensated were excluded.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chronic HF was diagnosed according to the HF guidelines. 12,13 Inclusion criteria for patients in this study: (1) the presence of symptoms and/or signs of HF; (2) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) > 125 pg/ml; (3) abnormal findings of echocardiography. Patients who had revascularization or acute coronary syndrome within 7 days prior, had acute pulmonary embolism, had large pericardial effusion or constrictive pericarditis leading to cardiac tamponade, had septic shock, had hypertensive crisis, were receiving mechanical circulatory support or were acutely decompensated were excluded.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right heart catheterization (RHC), as an integral aspect of the diagnosis and management of HF, provides clinicians with important hemodynamic profiles. 1 Among various hemodynamic parameters measured by RHC, cardiac output (CO) is the most popular one used to characterize the clinical phenotype of patients with cardiovascular destabilization. However, attempts to predict the prognosis of patients with HF using CO have always been controversial, as many analyses demonstrated that resting CO had less prognostic utility and was not associated with outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely accepted standard for monitoring CO is the Swan-Ganz catheter. However, the operation is not only complicated but can also induce severe complications (3). Because of advanced perioperative bedside ultrasound techniques, screening an indicator with good predictive performance, robust results, and easy operation procedure to predict the volume responsiveness and guide fluid therapy has become an urgent requirement for clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than half a century, physicians caring for critically ill patients have sought to tailor intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation to patients' physiologic states 1 . Routine use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring by pulmonary artery catheterization fell from favor in the early 2000s when high‐quality trial data demonstrated increased patient risk without improved outcomes 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%