2009
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia

Abstract: Abstract:Lake Tana Basin is of significant importance to Ethiopia concerning water resources aspects and the ecological balance of the area. Many years of mismanagement, wetland losses due to urban encroachment and population growth, and droughts are causing its rapid deterioration. The main objective of this study was to assess the performance and applicability of the soil water assessment tool (SWAT) model for prediction of streamflow in the Lake Tana Basin, so that the influence of topography, land use, soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
163
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
163
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sediment yield estimated by SWAT model for the UW (44.8 t ha −1 year −1 ) and TW (33.5 t ha −1 year −1 ) was in agreement with other studies. Setegn et al (2010) reported that sediment loads of 30-60 t ha −1 year −1 were exported from the Lake Tana watersheds while Easton et al (2010) predicted a maximum soil loss of 84 t ha −1 year −1 in the Gumara watershed. Similarly, Zimale et al (2016) reported an average sediment yield of 49 t ha −1 y −1 from the Gumara watershed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sediment yield estimated by SWAT model for the UW (44.8 t ha −1 year −1 ) and TW (33.5 t ha −1 year −1 ) was in agreement with other studies. Setegn et al (2010) reported that sediment loads of 30-60 t ha −1 year −1 were exported from the Lake Tana watersheds while Easton et al (2010) predicted a maximum soil loss of 84 t ha −1 year −1 in the Gumara watershed. Similarly, Zimale et al (2016) reported an average sediment yield of 49 t ha −1 y −1 from the Gumara watershed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is one of the most comprehensive models able to evaluate hydrologic processes (Gassman et al 2007). SWAT has been employed to simulate the discharge in the Ethiopian highlands (Setegn et al 2008;Setegn et al 2009;Easton et al 2010;Setegn et al 2010;Betrie et al 2011;Setegn et al 2011). Hence, the objectives of this study were (1) to calibrate and validate the SWAT model for two watersheds with and without SWC structures, (2) to study the impact of these structures on runoff and erosion processes, and (3) to provide feedback on the efficiency of the structures in reducing soil erosion in the watersheds and to advise future upscaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a model of water distribution to be coupled to a GIS interface; it considers the spatial variability of physical characteristics within a river basin. Several studies have applied this model to analyze the effects of land use changes on the hydrological flows in river basins (SETEGN et al, 2010;PEREIRA et al, 2014b;GALHARTE et al, 2014;SILVA et al, 2015). Nonetheless, SWAT may be unsuitable for simulations in small basins (KIM & LEE, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies with focus on the hydrology of the Gilgel Abbay catchment are reported by Abdo et al (2009), Setegn et al (2010 and Uhlenbrook et al (2010). Abdo et al (2009) showed that climate change may affect the hydrological regime of the Gilgel Abbay catchment with a lower rainfall amount prospected for the year 2080.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdo et al (2009) showed that climate change may affect the hydrological regime of the Gilgel Abbay catchment with a lower rainfall amount prospected for the year 2080. In Setegn et al (2010) attention is on uncertainty analysis of hydrological modeling by the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) (Arnold et al, 1998) but issues of land cover change are ignored. In Uhlenbrook et al (2010) attention is on hydrologic modeling of Koga catchment and the Gilgel Abbay catchment that was partitioned in the Upper Gilgel Abbay that is gauged and the lower part that is ungauged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%