Digital Business Discourse 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137405579_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swearing Is E-Business: Expletives in Instant Messaging in Hong Kong Workplaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Code 3 suggested that the misunderstanding is to be rated. Mak and Lee (2015) Figure 3 shows a delay in time of response possibly due to poor internet reception. However, the client has taken offence, and common turn-taking conversation method (Code 2) has been disrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Code 3 suggested that the misunderstanding is to be rated. Mak and Lee (2015) Figure 3 shows a delay in time of response possibly due to poor internet reception. However, the client has taken offence, and common turn-taking conversation method (Code 2) has been disrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be an important tool of resistance to authority and contribute to the redefinition of power relationships. Mak and Lee (2015) investigate the use of expletives in IM in the context of white-collar workplaces in Hong Kong and conclude that swearing in IM is much more intentional and strategic that in face to face communication. Alongside expressions of frustration, expletives in IM can help employees release work-oriented pressure, preface bad news or help share negative feelings.…”
Section: Seminal Work Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although profanity has been related to the concept of incivility, this study does not claim that profanity equates to incivility. Rather, profanity is one of the most commonly employed linguistic tactics used to trigger emotional arousal and a sense of offensiveness (Jay, 2000; Kwon and Cho, 2017; Mak and Lee, 2015). While prior empirical studies often examine profanity as one type of uncivil speech (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%