2006
DOI: 10.2148/benv.32.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweden: The Life and Death and Life of Great Neighbourhood Centres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two areas of Stockholm which form the geographical focus of this paper, Rinkeby and Södermalm, in many ways embody the increasing fragmentation of recent decades. Rinkeby, an area born out of a modernistic planning initiative of the 1960s, has even since relatively early in its history, housed a largely immigrant population (Nyström and Lundström 2006), and the proportion of foreign born residents in the area has continued to grow since the 1970s, so that now the percentage of residents in the larger Rinkeby‐Tensta region with a foreign background is around 83%, the highest in Stockholm (Stockholms Stad 2017a). It has been largely characterised within the Swedish imaginary as an area suffering from a number of social issues, and as such is often drawn upon to illustrate the failures of Swedish integration policies, although such one‐sided narratives are frequently challenged by local residents (Pred 2000; Ritz 2016).…”
Section: Swedish Neoliberalism and The Production Of A Divided Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two areas of Stockholm which form the geographical focus of this paper, Rinkeby and Södermalm, in many ways embody the increasing fragmentation of recent decades. Rinkeby, an area born out of a modernistic planning initiative of the 1960s, has even since relatively early in its history, housed a largely immigrant population (Nyström and Lundström 2006), and the proportion of foreign born residents in the area has continued to grow since the 1970s, so that now the percentage of residents in the larger Rinkeby‐Tensta region with a foreign background is around 83%, the highest in Stockholm (Stockholms Stad 2017a). It has been largely characterised within the Swedish imaginary as an area suffering from a number of social issues, and as such is often drawn upon to illustrate the failures of Swedish integration policies, although such one‐sided narratives are frequently challenged by local residents (Pred 2000; Ritz 2016).…”
Section: Swedish Neoliberalism and The Production Of A Divided Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kungsholmen is perceived as a popular middle-class city neighbourhood with various types of private-owned and rental housing (ibid. ), whereas Farsta and Rinkeby are typical Swedish ABC-city suburban neighbourhoods built in the 1960s and 1970s, respectively [60,61]. In contrast to the other two neighbourhoods, Rinkeby has a large stock of housing accommodating low-income and immigrant residents.…”
Section: Study Design and Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going east to west these are Blackeberg, Råcksta, Grimsta, Vällingby, Johannelund (an industrial district), Hässelby Gård, and Hässelby Strand. Each of these were planned to be within walking distance of a tunnelbana station and each would have its own centre with the exception of Johannelund (Nyström and Lundström 2006). Vällingby would act as the nucleus of this development.…”
Section: Welcome To Vällingbymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retail firms opened in the district centres and other organisations (public and private) located in the Vällingby development area including IBM, the headquarters of Svenska Bostäder and the national power company Vattenfall (Sax 1998). Nevertheless, the area would struggle to attract employers and, as Nyström and Lundström (2006) noted, of the approximately 14,000 people working in Vällingby in 1965 less than a thousand of them lived there. (1961, p. 206) were pleased that "the centre can be reached from most parts of the development without having to cross a single street".…”
Section: Welcome To Vällingbymentioning
confidence: 99%