2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweetening responses of potato tubers of different maturity to conventional and non-conventional storage temperature regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although three major components contribute to late blight resistance in tubers; the phellem cells (periderm), the outer cortical cell layers and the medulla storage tissues characterized by reduced hyphal growth and sporulation of P. infestans (Pathak and Clarke 1987) in this study, only the contribution of the medullar storage tissues was assessed. Temperature has a profound influence on the physiology of potato tubers (Kaur et al 2009;Knowles et al 2009;Kumar 2009) and also on the pathology of tubers as pertaining to late blight (Kirk et al 2001d;Lambert and Currier 1997). The inclusion of the three temperature conditions was intended to simulate late blight development in tubers stored for seed, table-stock and processing, 3°C, 7°C and 10°C, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although three major components contribute to late blight resistance in tubers; the phellem cells (periderm), the outer cortical cell layers and the medulla storage tissues characterized by reduced hyphal growth and sporulation of P. infestans (Pathak and Clarke 1987) in this study, only the contribution of the medullar storage tissues was assessed. Temperature has a profound influence on the physiology of potato tubers (Kaur et al 2009;Knowles et al 2009;Kumar 2009) and also on the pathology of tubers as pertaining to late blight (Kirk et al 2001d;Lambert and Currier 1997). The inclusion of the three temperature conditions was intended to simulate late blight development in tubers stored for seed, table-stock and processing, 3°C, 7°C and 10°C, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oleh karena itu, teknologi untuk menghambat kerusakan tersebut perlu diupayakan untuk menjamin mutu kentang segar tetap prima sampai di tangan konsumen meski disimpan dalam kurun waktu yang cukup lama. Beberapa teknologi untuk menghambat kerusakan umbi kentang tersebut antara lain dengan membatasi lingkungan penyimpanan kentang menyangkut pengaturan suhu, kelembaban, intensitas penyinaran, dan iradiasi 7,8,9 . Penanganan segar kentang di Indonesia belum banyak menerapkan tknologi yang memadai dalam rangkaian tataniaganya, sehingga tingkat kerusakan masih lebih dari 20%.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Hasil sidik ragam menyatakan bahwa kadar air umbi kentang tidak berbeda nyata pada taraf 5% selama penyimpanan dengan kondisi pencahayaan 100-500 lux/ lilin dan tanpa cahaya (gelap) pada suhu kamar (ambient) 8,9 Kadar air dalam umbi kentang merupakan indikasi dari tingkat kesegaran sehingga berpengaruh terhadap mutu, terutama fisik. Kadar air umbi kentang berkisar antara 83,38-86,28%.…”
Section: Kadar Airunclassified
“…For example, tubers harvested when immature have a less well-developed periderm and higher rates of respiration than those harvested when more mature (Burton 1978;Lulai and Orr 1993). Tubers harvested when immature or over mature are more likely to exhibit high reducing sugars in storage than those harvested at optimal maturity (Driskill et al 2007;Knowles et al 2009;Pritchard and Adam 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focused primarily on the influence of harvest date and vine kill on yield (Ivany and Sanderson 2001;Waterer 2007), fry color (Driskill et al 2007;Miller et al 1975;Nelson and Sowokinos 1983;Waterer 2007) and tuber sugar profiles (Pritchard and Adam 1992;Sabba et al 2007). Both early and late harvest can lead to elevated reducing sugars or high fry color at the time of harvest (Miller et al 1975;Nelson and Shaw 1976) or in storage (Driskill et al 2007;Knowles et al 2009;Pritchard and Adam 1992), but how vine-kill treatment influences this is largely unknown. There is little published research describing how vine-kill treatments and timing of vine desiccation affect post-harvest tuber physiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%