2008
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32830ef940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switch of immunosuppression from cyclosporine A to everolimus: impact on pulse wave velocity in stable de-novo renal allograft recipients

Abstract: In renal allograft recipients, the prolonged treatment with CsA was associated with a significant increase of PWV whereas no further deterioration of large vessel compliance was observed in patients that were switched to EVR 6 months post transplantation. The cardiovascular risk profile in stable de-novo renal allograft recipients might therefore be positively impacted by an early switch of the primary immunosuppressive therapy from CsA to EVR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these patients are part of an ongoing prospective study encompassing measurements of vascular function, which has been described in a separate publication (20). Because the scope of our study was that of investigating the reversibility of atherosclerosis (as measured by IMT) after restoration of renal function by renal transplantation and the functional relationship between the longitudinal changes in IMT and CKD-MBD biomarkers, by protocol, we excluded patients with risk factors that may distort the interpretation of carotid artery changes brought about by successful renal transplantation, including diabetes, background cardiovascular disease, smoking, rejection episodes, and use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, a class of drugs that may per se have a favorable effect on atherosclerosis (21,22). The flowchart of the selection process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these patients are part of an ongoing prospective study encompassing measurements of vascular function, which has been described in a separate publication (20). Because the scope of our study was that of investigating the reversibility of atherosclerosis (as measured by IMT) after restoration of renal function by renal transplantation and the functional relationship between the longitudinal changes in IMT and CKD-MBD biomarkers, by protocol, we excluded patients with risk factors that may distort the interpretation of carotid artery changes brought about by successful renal transplantation, including diabetes, background cardiovascular disease, smoking, rejection episodes, and use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, a class of drugs that may per se have a favorable effect on atherosclerosis (21,22). The flowchart of the selection process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected all patients with uneventful clinical course (no rejection episodes). We excluded five patients on sirolimus or everolimus, because these drugs per se prevent intimal hyperplasia and have a different effect on vascular function compared with standard cyclosporin-based regimens (21,22) and four patients on a regimen including antithymocyte globulin (Muromonab-CD3), a drug that interferes in a complex manner with several components of the inflammation cascade (23). Five additional patients were excluded, because they had acute rejection episodes, and two patients were excluded because of positive cross-match transplant (n=1) or blood group system-incompatible transplant (n=1).…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have described a deleterious effect of CNI on arterial stiffness as measured using AI 75 and PWV [19e21,32]. Consistently, PWV decreases after conversion from cyclosporine to an mTOR inhibitor [33]. Interestingly, mTOR inhibitors even have antiarteriosclerotic properties [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Adicionalmente, la enfermedad cardiovascular y las neoplasias son puntos críticos importantes durante el seguimiento del trasplante; los inhibidores mTOR pueden ser una estrategia importante a considerar en receptores de trasplante renal 22,23 , ya que a través de su mecanismo de acción pueden llegar a retardar las lesiones arterioscleróticas progresivas y evitar el impacto negativo en la compliance de grandes vasos, asociado con CsA [24][25][26][27] ; encontrándose, igualmente, asociados con una reducida incidencia de neoplasias 28,29 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified