2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4611-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching Relations and Trajectories: The Development Procurement of the Axe Swedish Switching Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1960s, Japan used to use public purchasing as a direct developmental policy tool (Rothwell and Zegveld, 1981). In Sweden, a "developmental pair" approach evolved between the state and technology companies based on technology-intensive public-procurement programs (Fridlund, 2000). Compared with earlier programs, what seems to differ now is that recent policy initiatives have broader innovation impacts as a primary goal of public procurement.…”
Section: Possibilities and Limitations With Public Procurement Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1960s, Japan used to use public purchasing as a direct developmental policy tool (Rothwell and Zegveld, 1981). In Sweden, a "developmental pair" approach evolved between the state and technology companies based on technology-intensive public-procurement programs (Fridlund, 2000). Compared with earlier programs, what seems to differ now is that recent policy initiatives have broader innovation impacts as a primary goal of public procurement.…”
Section: Possibilities and Limitations With Public Procurement Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has orchestrated the main features of the innovation and research policy system and its growth model for industrial development and prosperity (Freeman, 1987, Lundvall, 1992. The concept of "development pairs" (Fridlund, 1999) describes the long-term development cooperation and close partner relationship formed between specific state client and private firms in order to exploit and develop new technology. Such relationships often played the role of driving force and a catalyst for growth of industrial development blocks (Dahmén, 1987), which later matured into defined innovation system or what Carlsson & Stankiewicz (1995) called "technology systems".…”
Section: Features Of the Swedish Innovation System And Innovation And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such relationships often played the role of driving force and a catalyst for growth of industrial development blocks (Dahmén, 1987), which later matured into defined innovation system or what Carlsson & Stankiewicz (1995) called "technology systems". The evolution of the Swedish innovation system offers a number of examples of niche management, e.g the state power authority which historically enjoyed great freedom from political interventions and the Swedish telecom industry, and different key companies or group of key firms (Fridlund, 1999, Laestadius & Berggren, 2000. However, the application of development pairs has exposed some negative structural features of the concept.…”
Section: Features Of the Swedish Innovation System And Innovation And Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8For a discussion of success cases, see for example Gregersen (1992), Langlois and Mowery (1996), Fridlund (1997) and Llherena et al (2000). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%