2020
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SYBR Green qPCR Technique for the Detection ofTrypanosoma cruziin Açaí Pulp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the characteristic dark color of the fruit, which is associated with high anthocyanin concentrations and a large amount of organic matter [34,35], greatly limit the possibility of parasites detection during microscopic visualization. In this context, molecular methods can overcome these limitations regarding analysis directly from food, and provide specific diagnosis [26,41,50,52,63] and T. cruzi genotyping [51]. The qPCR developed in the present study showed improved sensitivity, in which was possible to detect the DNA corresponding to 0.01 T. cruzi equivalents/mL in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, the characteristic dark color of the fruit, which is associated with high anthocyanin concentrations and a large amount of organic matter [34,35], greatly limit the possibility of parasites detection during microscopic visualization. In this context, molecular methods can overcome these limitations regarding analysis directly from food, and provide specific diagnosis [26,41,50,52,63] and T. cruzi genotyping [51]. The qPCR developed in the present study showed improved sensitivity, in which was possible to detect the DNA corresponding to 0.01 T. cruzi equivalents/mL in the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Ferreira et al[51], in order to evaluate the amplifiability of DNA in a conventional PCR, employed a plant-specific primer pair[78], which encodes the ribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase gene (rbcL) of the plant chloroplast. However, to date, published studies related to the development of a methodology based on Real-Time quantitative PCR, for the T. cruzi diagnosis in food samples, have not included an internal amplification control, despite using negative and positive controls in the reactions[26,50,52]. In our study, we used a synthetic DNA from a commercial kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to monitor the efficiency of the DNA extraction and the absence of inhibitors at qPCR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are laborious, time-consuming, and more subject to contamination [33]. Some studies were effective in identifying T. cruzi in food samples [9,18,[20][21][22][23]34]. Recently, our group developed an easily, reproducible, fast, and sensitive multiplex qPCR method that is capable of identifying the parasite's DNA in açaí pulp samples [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the lack of hygiene during the harvesting and handling stage of the fruit is one of the main targets of T. cruzi contamination, leading açaí to be the food associated with the highest number of cases of oral outbreaks of CD in the Brazilian Amazon region in recent years [12,17]. The use of PCR for the detection of T. cruzi DNA from açai has already been described in the literature, specifically in studies showing that the molecular detection technique has greater sensitivity compared to other detection methods [9,[18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, a recurrent issue regarding the use of DNA for pathogen detection is the correlation with its viability [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional PCR can only detect one pathogen at a time, but there are many pathogenic bacteria in food ( Kim and Kim, 2021 ). Therefore, based on conventional PCR, dozens of different types of PCR methods were derived, mainly including multiple polymerase chain reaction (mPCR), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and digital polymerase chain reaction technology (dPCR) ( Tang et al, 2018 ; Mou et al, 2019a ; Lei et al, 2020a ; Cardoso et al, 2020 ; Huang et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Molecular Biology Detection Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%