1957
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1957.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbiotic effectiveness in nodulated red clover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1958
1958
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Host X strain interaction contributed significantly to the observed variation in dry weight, N content and DW/N ratio, but this source of variation was less important quantitatively than the additive effects of host cultivar and Rhizobium strain (Tab, 1), Strain differences accounted for the largest effects on N content and DW/N ratio, whereas the largest effects on dry weight were due to cultivar differences. The presence of interaction confirms results obtained with other legumes such as alfalfa (Erdman and Means 1953, Gibson 1962, Tan 1981, clover species (Nutman 1954, Mytton 1975, Smith et al, 1982, cowpea (Minchin et al, 1978) and field bean , The results of such experiments, however, depend on the choice of host and strain genotypes as emphasized by Smith et al, (1982) and Dean et al, (1980). It is also illustrated by the work of Mahon (1979) and Hobbs and Mahon (1982) on pea genotype and Rhizobium strain effects on CjHj reduction activity, Mahon (1979) found no interaction, whereas Hobbs and Mahon (1982) observed significant interaction when other host X strain combinations were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Host X strain interaction contributed significantly to the observed variation in dry weight, N content and DW/N ratio, but this source of variation was less important quantitatively than the additive effects of host cultivar and Rhizobium strain (Tab, 1), Strain differences accounted for the largest effects on N content and DW/N ratio, whereas the largest effects on dry weight were due to cultivar differences. The presence of interaction confirms results obtained with other legumes such as alfalfa (Erdman and Means 1953, Gibson 1962, Tan 1981, clover species (Nutman 1954, Mytton 1975, Smith et al, 1982, cowpea (Minchin et al, 1978) and field bean , The results of such experiments, however, depend on the choice of host and strain genotypes as emphasized by Smith et al, (1982) and Dean et al, (1980). It is also illustrated by the work of Mahon (1979) and Hobbs and Mahon (1982) on pea genotype and Rhizobium strain effects on CjHj reduction activity, Mahon (1979) found no interaction, whereas Hobbs and Mahon (1982) observed significant interaction when other host X strain combinations were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Intermediately effective strain 008 produced the largest amount of variability and the most likely improvement in average productivity would be obtained therefore, if plant selection were carried out in relation to this intermediate strain. Nutman (1954) has already shown a good response to selection in red clover with an intermediately effective rhizobium strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По-третє, рослина визначає кінцеву ефективність симбіотичної азотфіксації. Так, у конюшини виявлено два гени, що сприяють утворенню неефективного симбіозу незалежно від властивостей використаного штаму бульбочкових бактерій [33]. По-четверте, бобова рослина, як і бактерії, бере участь у синтезі леггемоглобіну бульбочок [34] Розроблена технологія має широкомасштабне впровадження.…”
Section: таблиця 2 можливі розміри симбіотичної фіксації азоту та йог...unclassified