2003
DOI: 10.1177/0959354303136005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic and Sub-Symbolic Representations in Computational Models of Human Cognition

Abstract: The debate over symbolic versus sub-symbolic representations of human cognition has been continuing for thirty years, with little indication of a resolution. The argument is this: Does the human cognitive system use symbols as a representation of knowledge, and does it process symbols and their respective constituents? Or does the human cognitive system use a distributed representation of knowledge, and is it somehow capable of processing this distributed representation of knowledge in a complex and meaningful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Procedural memory was unconscious, episodic, and instance-based while declarative memory was more conscious, semantic, and fact based. This type of separation also maps well onto the symbolic and subsymbolic distinctions of knowledge organization [34]. Procedural memory is easily characterized as subsymbolic, while declarative memory is more easily characterized as symbolic.…”
Section: B Psychologymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Procedural memory was unconscious, episodic, and instance-based while declarative memory was more conscious, semantic, and fact based. This type of separation also maps well onto the symbolic and subsymbolic distinctions of knowledge organization [34]. Procedural memory is easily characterized as subsymbolic, while declarative memory is more easily characterized as symbolic.…”
Section: B Psychologymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This appearance should arise naturally from the organization of the network and the way of information representation and not from any separable layers of a composite system (As an attempt towards this goal Smolensky et al used tensor product representation; this approach is not discussed here.). A similar integrated symbolic and sub-symbolic approach is also advocated by Kelley [8].…”
Section: Sub-symbolic and Symbolic Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, we are then faced with the problem of how to integrate stochastic information with logic; the classical problem of symbolic/subsymbolic integration [8], [9].…”
Section: Symbolic Processing Within P-a Learning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%