2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113883119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry and simplicity spontaneously emerge from the algorithmic nature of evolution

Abstract: Significance Why does evolution favor symmetric structures when they only represent a minute subset of all possible forms? Just as monkeys randomly typing into a computer language will preferentially produce outputs that can be generated by shorter algorithms, so the coding theorem from algorithmic information theory predicts that random mutations, when decoded by the process of development, preferentially produce phenotypes with shorter algorithmic descriptions. Since symmetric structures need less … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we argue that the view presented in the very interesting paper by Johnston et al. ( 1 ) is too one-sided. To fully understand how symmetry develops in biological systems, the trade-off between the spontaneous emergence of symmetry and evolutionary pressures toward asymmetry needs to be integrated in a balanced way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we argue that the view presented in the very interesting paper by Johnston et al. ( 1 ) is too one-sided. To fully understand how symmetry develops in biological systems, the trade-off between the spontaneous emergence of symmetry and evolutionary pressures toward asymmetry needs to be integrated in a balanced way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The argument brought forward by the authors ( 1 ) is very compelling but omits a critical point. While symmetry may arise more commonly in biological structures with low complexity, there is evolutionary pressure to develop asymmetry in many biological structures with high complexity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper ( 1 ), we argue for strong bias in the arrival of variation toward phenotypes with simple descriptions. Evaluating evidence for such hypotheses about developmental bias is hard because one needs to answer counterfactual questions ( 2 , 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A similar constraint induced dimensionality reduction is considered to stabilize symmetric phenotypes in genotype-phenotype maps 88 . In the context of ASD- and schizophrenia-associated genotypes mapping to a synaptic phenotype space with reduced dimensionality caused by interaction-based constraints, this means that a multitude of seemingly unrelated disease-associated mutations, can drive similar perturbations to the lower-dimensional stable/allowed-state landscape, as measured in synaptic protein networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%