2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.235147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry constraints on the elastoresistivity tensor

Abstract: The elastoresistivity tensor m ij,kl characterizes changes in a material's resistivity due to strain. As a fourth-rank tensor, elastoresistivity can be a uniquely useful probe of the symmetries and character of the electronic state of a solid. We present a symmetry analysis of m ij,kl (both in the presence and absence of a magnetic field) based on the crystalline point group, focusing for pedagogic purposes on the D 4h point group (of relevance to several materials of current interest). We also discuss the rel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a measure of the thermodynamic nematic susceptibility, elastoresistive measurements were taken across the Ba 1−x Sr x Ni 2 As 2 phase diagram. Within the D 4h point group, elastoresistive coefficient m 12 − m 11 are directly proportional to χ B1g nem while m 66 is directly proportional to χ B2g nem [38]. Both m 12 − m 11 and m 66 were measured in samples adhered directly to a lead-zirconiumtitanate (PZT) piezoelectric stack using a strain transmitting epoxy as discussed in Refs.…”
Section: Elastoresistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a measure of the thermodynamic nematic susceptibility, elastoresistive measurements were taken across the Ba 1−x Sr x Ni 2 As 2 phase diagram. Within the D 4h point group, elastoresistive coefficient m 12 − m 11 are directly proportional to χ B1g nem while m 66 is directly proportional to χ B2g nem [38]. Both m 12 − m 11 and m 66 were measured in samples adhered directly to a lead-zirconiumtitanate (PZT) piezoelectric stack using a strain transmitting epoxy as discussed in Refs.…”
Section: Elastoresistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the base resistance R 0 used to normalize the elastoresistivity response carries some ambiguity. 29 If the physical origin of the magnetoresistance of Ba(Fe 1−x Co x ) 2 As 2 were independent of nematic fluctuations, the most physically motivated choice would be to normalize by the extrapolated zero field resistance.…”
Section: Appendix A: Normalization Of Resistivity Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence for nematic response was first obtained in the BaFe 2 As 2 system [10][11][12][13][14][15], where a structural transition that lowers the rotational symmetry from C 4 to C 2 is closely followed by antiferromagnetic ordering [16][17][18], with modulation wave vector (π, 0) [19]. New interest has been generated by the recent observations of nematicity in FeSe [20], a superconducting compound that exhibits a symmetry-lowering structural transition but no magnetic order [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%