2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-011-0079-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symplectic homology of Lefschetz fibrations and Floer homology of the monodromy map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can partially describe (2.48) in topological terms, along the lines of [25]. Rather than encapsulating that into a spectral sequence, we break up the statement into pieces (the proofs of which will be described in Section 5b; we emphasize that this follows known ideas): Lemma 2.24.…”
Section: Lemma 223mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can partially describe (2.48) in topological terms, along the lines of [25]. Rather than encapsulating that into a spectral sequence, we break up the statement into pieces (the proofs of which will be described in Section 5b; we emphasize that this follows known ideas): Lemma 2.24.…”
Section: Lemma 223mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section reviews the groups HF * q,q −1 (p, r) from (2.48), following [42], and adds more concrete computational material along the lines of [25]. We only deal with fibrations which have trivial monodromy at infinity, which makes both the technical arguments and the outcome of the computations particularly simple.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Floer Cohomology For Lefschetz Fibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a > 0 small, the group HF * (φ, a) has already appeared in the work of Seidel [26] and McLean [17]. After the first version of this paper was written, the paper [23] by Seidel was posted on the ArXiv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea can be generalized to other r > 0, leading to a version of the spectral sequence from [20], involving powers of µ (see [29,Lemma 6.14] for the statement). The situation for r < 0 is dual: there are nondegenerate pairings (2.7) HF * (E, −r) ⊗ HF 2n− * (E, r) −→ K.…”
Section: Main Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%