2012
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symptom burden & quality of life among patients receiving second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2022, 24 The sample sizes ranged from 104 21 to 5442 22 patients and three of the five studies had less than 250 patients. 21, 23, 24 Across the 5 studies, the weighted grand mean age was 59.5 years and gender distribution was approximately equal. In three of the five studies, 21, 23, 24 100% of the patients had CRC and in one study, 20 49.6% of the patients had colon cancer and 50.4% had rectal cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2022, 24 The sample sizes ranged from 104 21 to 5442 22 patients and three of the five studies had less than 250 patients. 21, 23, 24 Across the 5 studies, the weighted grand mean age was 59.5 years and gender distribution was approximately equal. In three of the five studies, 21, 23, 24 100% of the patients had CRC and in one study, 20 49.6% of the patients had colon cancer and 50.4% had rectal cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2022, 24 The fifth study used a descriptive, longitudinal, repeated-measures design. 23 Across these five studies, retrospective data were used in four. 2022, 24 The sample sizes ranged from 104 21 to 5442 22 patients and three of the five studies had less than 250 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation of symptoms within the context of these RCTs is limited because most studies used the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Only four studies used valid and reliable symptom assessment instruments to evaluate various dimensions of the symptom experience (i.e., occurrence, severity, distress) in patients with GI cancers receiving CTX (27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one retrospective, cohort study evaluated the symptom experience of patients with GI cancers on targeted therapies (30). In this study, differences in the symptom burden of patients with CRC who received second-line treatments that contained bevacizumab or cetuximab with or without CTX were evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%