“…However, in the meta-regression, it was possible to T. denticola (0%*, 16.6%**), T. socranskii (11.1%*, 0%**) Gomes et al, 2012 (29) PI*, PSI** AAP RC PP PCR T. denticola (20%*, 6.7%**), T. socranskii (33%*, 6.7%**) Buonavoglia et al, 2013 (79) PI, PSI AAA*, SAP**, AAP*** RC PP PCR T. denticola (37%*, 21%**, 7.1%***) N obrega et al, 2013 (80) PSI SAP*, AAP** RC PP Nested PCR T. denticola (32.3%*, 0%**) T. maltophilum (32.3%*, 20%**) T. medium (17.6%*, 40%**) T. socranskii (17.6%*, 40%**) T. pectinovorum (17.6%*, 0%**) T. vincentii (20.6%*, 0%**) T. lecithinolyticum (11.8%*, 0%**) T. amylovorum (8.8%*, 0%**) AAP, asymptomatic apical periodontitis; AL, apical lesion; EAP, exacerbated apical periodontitis; PI, primary infection; PP, paper point; PSI, persistent/secondary infection; RC, root canal; SAP, symptomatic apical periodontitis; SR, surgical removal. In each study the number of asterisks (*) indicates the corresponding study characteristic and treponema prevalence accordingly.…”