1. Nutricia advanced medical Nutrition, danone Research, centre for specialised Nutrition, Wageningen, the Netherlands; 2. utrecht institute for Pharmaceutical sciences (uiPs), utrecht university, the Netherlands; 3. alzheimer centre limburg, school for mental Health and Neuroscience, maastricht university medical centre, the Netherlands; 4. alzheimer centre Nijmegen, department of Geriatrics, Radboud university Nijmegen medical centre, the Netherlands; 5. department of Health sciences, Vu university medical center, amsterdam, the Netherlands; 6. alzheimer centre, Vu university medical center, amsterdam, the Netherlands. correspondence to: Professor Philip scheltens, department of Neurology and alzheimer center, Vu university medical center, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV amsterdam, the Netherlands, p.scheltens@vumc.nl, tel: +31 (0) 20 444 0816, abstract: Objective: to investigate the extent that baseline cognitive impairment and intake adherence affected the 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale -cognitive subscale (adas-cog) intervention response of a medical food in alzheimer's disease (ad) patients. Design/setting/participants /intervention/measurements: this analysis was performed on data from a proof-of-concept study, consisting of a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, followed by a similarly designed 12-week extension study. Patients with mild ad (mini-mental state examination [mmse] score of 20-26) were randomized to receive active or control product as a 125 ml daily drink. One of the co-primary outcome measures was the 13-item adas-cog. in this analysis, the study population was divided into two subgroups: patients with 'low' baseline adas-cog scores (<25.0) and patients with 'high' baseline adas-cog scores (≥25.0). Repeated measures models (Rmm) were used to determine the relationship between adas-cog score and intervention. Results: a significant treatment effect (F[1,319]=4.0, p=0.046) was shown in patients with 'high' baseline adas-cog, but not in patients with 'low' baseline adas-cog (F[1,250]=1.25, p=0.265). Overall, intake adherence was significantly correlated with adas-cog improvement in the active product group (correlation coefficient=-0.260; p=0.019), but not the control group. Conclusion: these data indicate that baseline adas-cog significantly influenced the effect of souvenaid intervention on adas-cog outcome. a higher intake of active study product was also associated with greater cognitive benefit. these findings highlight the potential benefits of souvenaid in ad patients and warrant confirmation in larger, controlled studies.