2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic Computation and Sensory Processing in Neocortical Layer 2/3

Abstract: Computations in neocortical circuits are predominantly driven by synaptic integration of excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic inputs. New optical, electrophysiological, and genetic methods allow detailed in vivo investigation of the superficial neocortical layers 2 and 3 (L2/3). Here, we review current knowledge of mouse L2/3 sensory cortex, focusing on somatosensory barrel cortex with comparisons to visual and auditory cortex. Broadly tuned, dense subthreshold synaptic input accompanied by sparse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

30
216
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
(309 reference statements)
30
216
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average number of neurons that could be detected simultaneously with a single octrode was 1.16 Ϯ 0.4 (range: 0 -8) in the thalamus and 0.6 Ϯ 0.3 (range: 0 -6) in the cortex. In our opinion, the putative reasons behind the lower cortical unit yield are the sparse firing of neurons located in the supragranular cortical layers (de Kock et al 2007;de Kock and Sakmann 2009;Petersen and Crochet 2013;Sakata and Harris 2009) and the smaller dorsoventral extension of the cortex compared with the thalamus, but we cannot exclude the possibility that the im- Fig. 2.…”
Section: Sua Recorded With the Edc Probementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The average number of neurons that could be detected simultaneously with a single octrode was 1.16 Ϯ 0.4 (range: 0 -8) in the thalamus and 0.6 Ϯ 0.3 (range: 0 -6) in the cortex. In our opinion, the putative reasons behind the lower cortical unit yield are the sparse firing of neurons located in the supragranular cortical layers (de Kock et al 2007;de Kock and Sakmann 2009;Petersen and Crochet 2013;Sakata and Harris 2009) and the smaller dorsoventral extension of the cortex compared with the thalamus, but we cannot exclude the possibility that the im- Fig. 2.…”
Section: Sua Recorded With the Edc Probementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Cortical states are typically defined by the degree of shared fluctuations among cortical neural populations, measured by local field potential (LFP) frequency power (Harris and Thiele, 2011), and neural population correlations (Kohn et al, 2009). Cortical states exert profound effects on sensory responses (Haider and McCormick, 2009;Petersen and Crochet, 2013), but there remain unresolved questions about cortical states and their effects on sensory perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this widely used synthetic indicator has insufficient sensitivity to detect Ca 2+ transients evoked by single action potentials under in vivo conditions [26]. This sensitivity is extremely important in studies of the topographic organization of the Au1, because many cortical neurons respond to sound stimulation with only one or two spikes, particularly in layer 2/3 [27,28]. In addition, Bandyopadhyay et al and Rothschild et al have imaged the mouse Au1 with fluo-4 [9,15], a synthetic dye with a higher detection sensitivity and a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than OGB-1 [9,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%