2004
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synaptic structural modification following changes in activity induced by tetanus neurotoxin in cat abducens neurons

Abstract: A low or a high dose of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) injected in the lateral rectus muscle of the cat causes respectively, functional block of inhibitory synapses only or of both inhibitory and excitatory synapses simultaneously in abducens neurons (González-Forero et al. [2003] J. Neurophysiol. 89:1878-1890). As a consequence, neuronal firing activity increases (at low dose) or decreases (at high dose). We investigated possible structural modifications of inhibitory synapses in response to these activity alterat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual or triple color immunofluorescence for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) (for motoneurons), synaptophysin (SYN) (for synaptic boutons) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (for astrocytes) was performed by mixing the following primary antibodies and dilutions: ChAT [goat polyclonal antibody (pAb); 1:300; Millipore], SYN (rabbit pAb; 1:500; Zymed Laboratories) and GFAP [mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7a; 1:800; Sigma]. To determine which fraction of the boutons was inhibitory, a series of experiments used the marker vesicular GABA/glycine transporter (VGAT) (Dumoulin et al, 1999;González-Forero et al, 2004), which is the vesicular ␥-aminobutyric acid transporter also known as vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter (VIAAT) that transports GABA and glycine into synaptic vesicles (rabbit pAb; 1:500, Millipore). Labeling of terminals with vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 (VGLUT1 and VGLUT2) (guinea pig pAb; 1:300 -1:1000; Millipore) yielded very low number of boutons on abducens motoneurons and no further attempts to characterize them were done.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual or triple color immunofluorescence for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) (for motoneurons), synaptophysin (SYN) (for synaptic boutons) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (for astrocytes) was performed by mixing the following primary antibodies and dilutions: ChAT [goat polyclonal antibody (pAb); 1:300; Millipore], SYN (rabbit pAb; 1:500; Zymed Laboratories) and GFAP [mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7a; 1:800; Sigma]. To determine which fraction of the boutons was inhibitory, a series of experiments used the marker vesicular GABA/glycine transporter (VGAT) (Dumoulin et al, 1999;González-Forero et al, 2004), which is the vesicular ␥-aminobutyric acid transporter also known as vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter (VIAAT) that transports GABA and glycine into synaptic vesicles (rabbit pAb; 1:500, Millipore). Labeling of terminals with vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 (VGLUT1 and VGLUT2) (guinea pig pAb; 1:300 -1:1000; Millipore) yielded very low number of boutons on abducens motoneurons and no further attempts to characterize them were done.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary antisera cocktails were performed by mixing the following primary antibodies and dilutions: ChAT (goat pAb, 1:300; Millipore), SYN (rabbit pAb, 1:500; Zymed Laboratories), GFAP (mouse mAb G-A-5, 1:800; Sigma), TrkA (directed against a specific peptide mapping adjacent to the carboxy terminus of the TrkA receptor; rabbit pAb, 1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and p75 NTR (rabbit, 1:200; a gift from Dr. Louis Reichardt). VGAT immunoreactivity was used to calculate which fraction of the total number of boutons was inhibitory (González-Forero et al, 2004). VGAT is the vesicular transporter of GABA and glycine (rabbit pAb, 1:500; Millipore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Nerve conduction velocities were not measured directly by the recording procedure, but the latency between the stimulation artifact and the initiation of the M-or H-waves showed no differences after injection of the toxin, similar to studies using analogous human peripheral nerves. 27,28 The total duration of the M-and Hwaves waves, which might be altered if tetanus toxin interfered directly with the intrinsic excitability of a-motor neurons 29 or neuromuscular transmission, 30,31 was similarly unaffected by the toxin. The slopes of the recruitment curves for the M- Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%