2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.05.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization of complex dynamical networks via pinning scheme design under hybrid topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1: Given the probability density function of the multivariate output of local subsystem i defined in Equation (5), the probability density function of the randomized controller of subsystem i defined in Equation (9), and Definition 1, the probabilistic message to be passed from subsystem i about a subset q of its internal states to subsystem j is given by, M j←i (y q t;i z t−1;i ) = N (µ q y t;i , q y t;i ),…”
Section: A Probabilistic Message Passingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1: Given the probability density function of the multivariate output of local subsystem i defined in Equation (5), the probability density function of the randomized controller of subsystem i defined in Equation (9), and Definition 1, the probabilistic message to be passed from subsystem i about a subset q of its internal states to subsystem j is given by, M j←i (y q t;i z t−1;i ) = N (µ q y t;i , q y t;i ),…”
Section: A Probabilistic Message Passingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where t;j and ν t;j are Gaussian noises with zero means and Q j and R j covariances respectively as can be inferred from Equation (5). The optimized randomized controller for the subsystems in the proposed decentralized control framework is defined in Equation (9). Based on (9), the stochastic representation of the randomized controller of subsystem j is given by, u t;j =ū t;j + η t;j ,…”
Section: Stochastic Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current advances include, multiagent systems [4], distributed control [5], [6], pinning control [7]- [9] and decentralized control [10], [11] to name a few. These advances however suffer from either over-representing single-agent architectures as far as the controller design is concerned, which are centralized and so complete observation of the global state must be known, or are decentralized and decisions are based only on incomplete and disconnected knowledge, or based on an approximate solution considering only a single simplifying averaged effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, the system cannot usually synchronize without an external controller. Then, lots of effective control methods have been adopted to achieve synchronization, such as adaptive control , feedback control , pinned control , impulsive control , intermittent state feedback control and so on. For example, in , adaptive controllers and updating rules were designed according to the state information of its neighborhood, then the authors achieved the distributed synchronization of agent networks with nonlinearities via adaptive controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%