2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.06193
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronization Patterns in Networks of Kuramoto Oscillators: A Geometric Approach for Analysis and Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some cross-sectional work illustrates the link between anatomical network controllability and fMRI dynamics across neurodevelopment (Tang et al, 2017). While the current study used a simplified model of dynamics that has been demonstrated to predict the controllability of Wilson-Cowan (Muldoon et al, 2016) and Kuramoto (Tiberi et al, 2017) oscillators coupled by empirically measured anatomical brain networks, it is important to note that theoretical predictions about controllability would be further strengthened by evaluating empirically measured neural activity in response to exogenous brain stimulation. For example, demonstrating that integrated or segregated or difficult to reach BOLD or EEG states are influenced by TMS as a function of boundary and modal controllability, respectively, would support the theoretical notions described here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some cross-sectional work illustrates the link between anatomical network controllability and fMRI dynamics across neurodevelopment (Tang et al, 2017). While the current study used a simplified model of dynamics that has been demonstrated to predict the controllability of Wilson-Cowan (Muldoon et al, 2016) and Kuramoto (Tiberi et al, 2017) oscillators coupled by empirically measured anatomical brain networks, it is important to note that theoretical predictions about controllability would be further strengthened by evaluating empirically measured neural activity in response to exogenous brain stimulation. For example, demonstrating that integrated or segregated or difficult to reach BOLD or EEG states are influenced by TMS as a function of boundary and modal controllability, respectively, would support the theoretical notions described here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In simulation studies, linear controllabilty statistics were related to predicted effects in dynamics simulated using Wilson-Cowan (Muldoon et al, 2016) oscillators in anatomical brain networks. In addition, they predicted topological changes in network dynamics simulated using Kuramoto oscillators (Tiberi et al, 2017). Thus, we focus on mathematically well defined linear control statistics due to their parsimony and pragmatic utility in applied contexts, such as neuromodulation research.…”
Section: Network Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should further include the contributions of noise to the system's dynamics. While linear models used in NCT support inferences that can be validated in nonlinear demonstrations (Muldoon et al, 2016, Tiberi, Favaretto, Innocenti, Bassett, & Pasqualetti, 2017, the relationships that characterize neural interactions are diversely nonlinear, and this diversity drives much of the complex dynamics observed in real neural systems (Deco, Jirsa, & McIntosh, 2011). In addition, neural systems are noisy (McDonnell & Ward, 2011), and neural noise can drive important dynamic features such as information processing (McDonnell & Ward, 2011) and multistability (i.e., multiple stable states in neural networks (Deco et al, 2011).…”
Section: Nonlinearity and Noisementioning
confidence: 99%