2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.100951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchronous estimation of state of health and remaining useful lifetime for lithium-ion battery using the incremental capacity and artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markiewicz et al [42] finds LSTM-RNN to benefit from being relative stable, notably because it does not suffer from the vanishing or exploding gradient problem [73,74]. Zhang et al [33] states that LSTM-RNN has good performance on sequential data due to the recurrent feedback. Finally, as argued by Nguyen and Medjaher [40], LSTM-RNN benefits from having a long-term memory meaning it can keep important information for later application.…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Markiewicz et al [42] finds LSTM-RNN to benefit from being relative stable, notably because it does not suffer from the vanishing or exploding gradient problem [73,74]. Zhang et al [33] states that LSTM-RNN has good performance on sequential data due to the recurrent feedback. Finally, as argued by Nguyen and Medjaher [40], LSTM-RNN benefits from having a long-term memory meaning it can keep important information for later application.…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some components can have a steady linear degradation at the start of their lifetime, but then suddenly start dropping by the end of it. This is common within e.g., batteries [30,33,54]. Hence, an issue of determining a hidden state process.…”
Section: Challenges For Predictive Maintenance Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Based on advanced machine learning algorithms and without sophisticated battery model, databased methods take selected battery external parameters as model inputs, which include current, voltage and ambient temperature, to realize online battery SOC estimation. 12,13 The machine learning algorithms include Gaussian process regression (GPR), [14][15][16] support vector machine (SVM), [17][18][19] neural network (NN), [20][21][22] fuzzy logic (FL), 23,24 and so on. Sahinoglu et al 14 proposed an original SOC estimation method using recurrent/regular GPR framework, where both simulation and experimental results verified the high estimation accuracy of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the last two types of methods have attracted tremendous attention due to their own advantages 11 . Based on advanced machine learning algorithms and without sophisticated battery model, data‐based methods take selected battery external parameters as model inputs, which include current, voltage and ambient temperature, to realize online battery SOC estimation 12,13 . The machine learning algorithms include Gaussian process regression (GPR), 14‐16 support vector machine (SVM), 17‐19 neural network (NN), 20‐22 fuzzy logic (FL), 23,24 and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are model-free, and do not need prior knowledge on the complex working principles of the battery. Various ML techniques have been applied to estimate the battery capacity fade, such as neural networks (NNs) (Dai et al, 2018;You et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019), recurrent neural network (RNN) (Chaoui and Ibe-Ekeocha, 2017;Eddahech et al, 2012), support vector machine (SVM) (Liu et al, 2018), support vector regression (SVR) (Weng et al, 2013), and relevance vector machine (RVM) (Guo et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2015), just to name a few. In You et al (2016), a NN with various optimization strategies is used for capacity estimation, by combining with the k-means clustering algorithm, achieving a RMSE of less than 2.44%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%