2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/777/2/109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrotron Lightcurves of Blazars in a Time-Dependent Synchrotron-Self Compton Cooling Scenario

Abstract: Blazars emit non-thermal radiation in all frequency bands from radio to γ-rays. Additionally, they often exhibit rapid flaring events at all frequencies with doubling time scale of the TeV and X-ray flux on the order of minutes, and such rapid flaring events are hard to explain theoretically. We explore the effect of the synchrotron-self Compton cooling, which is inherently time-dependent, leading to a rapid cooling of the electrons. Having discussed intensively the resulting effects of this cooling scenario o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of particles ablated in each slice is the integral over the density ′ ( ′ ) with respect to the slice volume d . In the case of a sphere, the volume of a slice between positions ′ and ′ + d ′ is (Zacharias & Schlickeiser 2013)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of particles ablated in each slice is the integral over the density ′ ( ′ ) with respect to the slice volume d . In the case of a sphere, the volume of a slice between positions ′ and ′ + d ′ is (Zacharias & Schlickeiser 2013)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of particles ablated in each slice is the integral over the density ′ ( ′ ) with respect to the slice volume. In the case of a sphere, the volume of a slice between positions ′ and ′ + d ′ is (Zacharias & Schlickeiser 2013)…”
Section: Cloud Ablation By the Relativistic Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this will lead to the increased number of parameters and a reasonable conclusion on the physical condition responsible for the flare cannot be derived. Again, we have not considered the light travel time effects [52,53,54,55] since the flare time scale at the source frame (t of ∼ 1 day in observer frame, the corresponding time in source frame will be…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%