2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2005.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrotrons versus globars, point-detectors versus focal plane arrays: Selecting the best source and detector for specific infrared microspectroscopy and imaging applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique enables probing and identifying the chemical makeup or molecular constituents of biological or complex heterogeneous soil or geological samples from their spatially resolved vibrational spectra on a microscopic scale (Johnston and Aochi, 1996;Lehmann et al, 2007;Marinkovic et al, 2002). Conventional benchtop infrared spectrometers are commonly equipped with thermal (globar) sources that provide infrared light that is comparable to the infrared radiation emitted from a synchrotron (Miller and Dumas, 2006;Miller and Smith, 2005). Yet, if the aperture for spatial investigations is decreased to limit the field of view to a small region of interest, the brightness of conventional benchtop infrared sources is by two to three orders of magnitude too low compared to synchrotron radiation (Bonetta et al, 2002;Raab and Martin, 2001), thus resulting in diffraction effects.…”
Section: Synchrotron-based Ftir Spectromicroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique enables probing and identifying the chemical makeup or molecular constituents of biological or complex heterogeneous soil or geological samples from their spatially resolved vibrational spectra on a microscopic scale (Johnston and Aochi, 1996;Lehmann et al, 2007;Marinkovic et al, 2002). Conventional benchtop infrared spectrometers are commonly equipped with thermal (globar) sources that provide infrared light that is comparable to the infrared radiation emitted from a synchrotron (Miller and Dumas, 2006;Miller and Smith, 2005). Yet, if the aperture for spatial investigations is decreased to limit the field of view to a small region of interest, the brightness of conventional benchtop infrared sources is by two to three orders of magnitude too low compared to synchrotron radiation (Bonetta et al, 2002;Raab and Martin, 2001), thus resulting in diffraction effects.…”
Section: Synchrotron-based Ftir Spectromicroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High spatial resolution measurements require small apertures and drastically reduce the amount of light available for imaging. This results in long acquisition times [18] and calls for a more intense and spatially coherent light source such as synchrotron radiation. The synchrotron sources are in many ways ideal for infrared microscopy [3,18], but price, complexity, and availability seriously limits the spreading of IR microscopes based on such sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in long acquisition times [18] and calls for a more intense and spatially coherent light source such as synchrotron radiation. The synchrotron sources are in many ways ideal for infrared microscopy [3,18], but price, complexity, and availability seriously limits the spreading of IR microscopes based on such sources. A more widespread method for increasing the spatial resolution is based on the attenuated total internal reflection technique [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High resolution infrared (IR) microscopy requires intense and spatial coherent sources of infrared radiation [2]. However, most IR microscopes are based on thermal IR sources with very low brightness and is therefore not suitable for high resolution measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%