2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65476-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergism between the Black Queen effect and the proteomic constraint on genome size reduction in the photosynthetic picoeukaryotes

Abstract: The photosynthetic picoeukaryotes (PPEs) comprise a rare example of free-living eukaryotes that have undergone genome reduction. Here, we examine a duality in the process; the proposed driver of genome reduction (the Black Queen hypothesis, BQH), and the resultant impact of genome information loss (the Proteomic Constraint hypothesis, PCH). The BQH predicts that some metabolites may be shared in the open ocean, thus driving loss of redundant metabolic pathways in individual genomes. In contrast, the PCH predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organisms operating under strong reductive selection frequently minimize genomes by eliminating redundancies (Luo et al 2011). In highly reduced picoplanktonic eukaryotic organisms, for example, the total number of gene families is conserved despite extensive gene loss (Derilus et al 2020). Instead, the average size of each gene family is decreased as a result of deletions of paralogous genes.…”
Section: Gene Deletion and Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms operating under strong reductive selection frequently minimize genomes by eliminating redundancies (Luo et al 2011). In highly reduced picoplanktonic eukaryotic organisms, for example, the total number of gene families is conserved despite extensive gene loss (Derilus et al 2020). Instead, the average size of each gene family is decreased as a result of deletions of paralogous genes.…”
Section: Gene Deletion and Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike other PPEs, such as Ostreococcus, P. SENEW3 displays robust growth in variable environmental conditions, tolerating both euryhaline conditions and temperatures between 16-32 °C [26]. In such extreme or challenging environments, this pressure for adaptive gene loss should be reduced since there are typically fewer community members to produced expensive metabolites [116][117][118]. Hence, the large range of environmental tolerances of P. SENEW3 and payoffs between growth, nutrient availability, and stress, presents an alternate environmental adaptation paradigm for PPEs.…”
Section: Gene Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hypothesis explaining this genome reduction in PPEs is the Black Queen hypothesis (BQH), which predicts that an availability of shared metabolites in marine environments would drive the loss of redundant metabolic pathways in individual genomes/species that are otherwise available within the surrounding microbial community. Providing a selective advantage by conserving an organism's finite resources through adaptive gene loss [116][117][118]. However, unlike other PPEs, such as Ostreococcus, P. SENEW3 displays robust growth in variable environmental conditions, tolerating both euryhaline conditions and temperatures between 16-32 °C [26].…”
Section: Gene Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above cheater-cooperator prediction is sensible for systems with a single common good (Cairns and Jalasvuori, 2018;Cordero et al, 2012;D'Souza et al, 2014;de Mazancourt and Schwartz, 2010;Estrela et al, 2016;Germerodt et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2012;Morris et al, 2012;Ndhlovu et al, 2021;Pande et al, 2016Pande et al, , 2014Shou et al, 2007;Stump et al, 2018;Van Vliet et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2019), and the prediction has been successfully applied to advance our understanding of microbial ecology and evolution (Brunet and Doolittle, 2018;Cairns and Jalasvuori, 2018;D'Souza et al, 2014;Derilus et al, 2020;Hesse and O'brien, 2024;Mas et al, 2016;Morris, 2015b;Morris et al, 2014;Ndhlovu et al, 2021;Takeuchi et al, 2024;Yuan and Meng, 2020). However, most communities in nature are likely to contain more than one common good (Morris, 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%