1993
DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(93)90137-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergism of alloying elements and pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…0.45 wt.%), which is usually described to be responsible for improving the localised corrosion resistance of DSS microstructures. 55,56 The expansion of the area covered by surface corrosion indicates that the corrosion process in 2202 DSS can even expand to larger areas without the need for large net anodic current densities. Usually, large net anodic current densities are required to breakdown the passive layer of stainless steels, which is facilitated by large cathode-to-anode ratios under thin-film electrolytes and large cathodic kinetics due to abundant atmospheric oxygen reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.45 wt.%), which is usually described to be responsible for improving the localised corrosion resistance of DSS microstructures. 55,56 The expansion of the area covered by surface corrosion indicates that the corrosion process in 2202 DSS can even expand to larger areas without the need for large net anodic current densities. Usually, large net anodic current densities are required to breakdown the passive layer of stainless steels, which is facilitated by large cathode-to-anode ratios under thin-film electrolytes and large cathodic kinetics due to abundant atmospheric oxygen reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower the passive current, the more effective is the passive fi lm as a kinetic barrier against corrosion reactions, and the lower will be the corrosion rate of the metal in the passive condition. The higher concentration of molybdenum or even the synergistic effect of nitrogen and molybdenum (Levey and Van Bennekom, 1995;Jargelius-Pettersson, 1999;Bandy and Cahoon, 1977;Lu, Ives, Clayton, 1993) through the co-segregation and the formation of a surface array which suppresses dissolution could be responsible for a passive fi lm that is more effi cient as a kinetic barrier in the ISO 5832-9 steel. The reduction in the passive current density can be attributed to the mechanism of nitrogen negativelycharged enrichment beneath the passive film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the same author, rapid repassivation may be favored by the effect of nitrogen in buffering pH by the ammonium ions formation, according to reaction (2). In addition, some authors suggest the formation of corrosion resistant Cr-or Mo-nitrides in the pit bottom, suppressing the growth of the pit (Levey and Van Bennekom, 1995;Jargelius-Pettersson, 1996;Lu, Ives, Clayton, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of small amounts of nitrogen can enhance the pitting resistance and passivation characteristics [12]. A synergistic influence of nitrogen and molybdenum on pitting corrosion resistance has noticed and enrichment of molybdenum and nitrogen on the surface at a level of at least seven times that the original concentration of nitrogen present in the alloy [14]. They have proved this enrichment of nitrogen and molybdenum at the interface to be the predominant factor for preventing further dissolution substrate consequent to the destruction of the passive film.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%