1975
DOI: 10.1084/jem.142.6.1591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic and suppressive interactions among mouse T lymphocytes in the response to phytohemagglutinin.

Abstract: A synergistic effect in the proliferative response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) can be observed in cultures containing a mixture of mouse CBA/Ca lymph node cells (LNC) and syngeneic CBA/T6T6 thymocytes (ThC) when compared to cultures containing only one cell type. This effect was analyzed, at various days of culture and in LNC-ThC mixtures of different ratios, by comparing the origin of the cells in mitosis (detected by caryotypic analysis), the stimulation of DNA synthesis, the number of blasts, and the percen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter notion is supported by our earlier observation that the T(VI) population was different from that of T(III) in that the former failed to cooperate with B cells [25]. This kind of T-T interaction may be related to the syner gistic interaction found between thymocytes and lymph node cells [34], or between ma ture and immature thymocytes in mice [35]. The fact that N-ALL, and even epidermal cells as well as B-ALL, displayed an en hancing activity similar to that of B(VIII) may be attributable to the possibility that any lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells ex cept autologous T cells alone may function as promoter cells in T-cell activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter notion is supported by our earlier observation that the T(VI) population was different from that of T(III) in that the former failed to cooperate with B cells [25]. This kind of T-T interaction may be related to the syner gistic interaction found between thymocytes and lymph node cells [34], or between ma ture and immature thymocytes in mice [35]. The fact that N-ALL, and even epidermal cells as well as B-ALL, displayed an en hancing activity similar to that of B(VIII) may be attributable to the possibility that any lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells ex cept autologous T cells alone may function as promoter cells in T-cell activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The binding of mitogen to the B-cell surface, making an effective stimu lant for T cells ('matrix presentation of mi togen' [34]), does not seem to be essential, since simple binding of mitogen to the mc-treated T-cell surface does not effec tuate enhanced T-cell response. Nonspecific facilitation with unresponsive cells or a feeder layer effect of B cells [31,34] may be responsible, while mc-treated, unrespon sive T cells alone failed to promote en hancement, indicating that cell-to-cell inter action between different antigenic determi nants is necessary as the second signal in this kind of physiological interaction. It ap pears that T-cell enhancement was induced by the T-cell recognition of the B-cell-specific determinants which were not present on T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studying the proliferative response to PHA by a mixture of lymph node cells and syngeneic thymocytes, Piquet et al (26) attributed the augmented response of the mixture to a nonspecific dilution of lymph node blasts. To determine whether this was also the case with LPF stimulation, and to provide information on the density of the accessory cells, adherent spleen cells were fractionated on a discontinuous BSA gradient (Table II).…”
Section: Synergistic Effect Of Nylon Wool-adherent Cell Fractions Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-T-cell interactions have been implicated in the proliferation of lymphocytes to Con A (27)(28)(29)(30) and PHA (26). However, the synergy between subpopulations of T cells in LPF-induced blastogenesis is improbable.…”
Section: Effect Of Anti-immunoglobulin Sera On Synergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction of Proliferation of PNL + Thc in Culture. SUP of 24-h cultures Of Con A or PHA stimulated LN cells or spleen cells are known to stimulate the proliferation of Thc (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). When PNL + Thc were cultured with Con A in a medium supplemented with 30% of such a SUP, or in presence of lethally irradiated LN cells, a strong proliferative response was observed (Table II).…”
Section: Characterization Of Pnl ÷ and -Thcmentioning
confidence: 99%