“…The physical and chemical responses of smectites in contact with anhydrous and wet CO 2 at high pressures have received considerable attention in the past decade. − For a typical smectite with charges of −0.2 to −0.5 per formula unit, there is a general agreement in the literature that the energy barrier to intercalate a dry Na + saturated smectite with anhydrous scCO 2 is significant unless the basal spacing of the interlayer is comparable to a monolayer hydrated (basal spacing ∼12.5 Å; noted 1WL in this paper) state. ,,,,,,,,,,− Such a basal spacing is attainable when the interlayer cation is large (e.g., Cs + with a 6-coordination ionic radius of 1.67 Å) or when a small amount of H 2 O is present in the interlayer (enough to produce a basal spacing similar to the 1WL case). However, inclusion of additional water to produce a bilayer hydrate (2WL) state or greater can expel intercalated CO 2 from the interlayer, with the final CO 2 content dependent on the amount of available H 2 O, the charge on the smectite layer, the identity of the charge-balancing cation in the smectite interlayers, and the extent of structural fluorination on the octahedral sheet. ,− ,,− , This trend in CO 2 adsorption behavior has been experimentally observed above the critical point for different model smectites, including Na + , Ca 2+ , K + , NH 4 + , and Mg 2+ montmorillonites − ,− and for Na + , Cs + , Ni 2+ , and Ca 2+ hectorites. ,, …”